The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
The average attendance for 2004 for WWE was 3,862, as compared to 2003, which was 4,537.
NODQ.com was my source. Reckon the WWE is going to wake up? That'll be down to 100 in a few years if they carry on like this...tbh, 4,537 isn't that good either...anyone know what it was back in the day? 1997 for eg?
NODQ.com was my source. Reckon the WWE is going to wake up? That'll be down to 100 in a few years if they carry on like this...tbh, 4,537 isn't that good either...anyone know what it was back in the day? 1997 for eg?
Lucy Jane wrote:
> it's only us
> small-minded internet nerds who are fat, homosexual and never stepped
> into a ring in our lives
hehe, Pat Patterson fell at the 3rd hurdle there. he's not welcome on these boards!
> it's only us
> small-minded internet nerds who are fat, homosexual and never stepped
> into a ring in our lives
hehe, Pat Patterson fell at the 3rd hurdle there. he's not welcome on these boards!
Lucy Jane wrote:
> Belated warning:- The above post may contain sarcasm.
no.......never
:-D
> Belated warning:- The above post may contain sarcasm.
no.......never
:-D
Took the words right out of my mouth.
Makes mental note to log out everytime I come on these 'pooters in future
Makes mental note to log out everytime I come on these 'pooters in future
Lipe wrote:
> Reckon the WWE is going to wake up?
No.
Because there is nothing wrong with the product, it's only us small-minded internet nerds who are fat, homosexual and never stepped into a ring in our lives who can find anything wrong with the product because we nit pick every match with a fine tooth comb and highlight every botched arm-drag. The casual fan still loves the WWE and gobbles up quality angles and gimmicks like Hassan and Daviri. Isn't that right Vince.
Belated warning:- The above post may contain sarcasm.
> Reckon the WWE is going to wake up?
No.
Because there is nothing wrong with the product, it's only us small-minded internet nerds who are fat, homosexual and never stepped into a ring in our lives who can find anything wrong with the product because we nit pick every match with a fine tooth comb and highlight every botched arm-drag. The casual fan still loves the WWE and gobbles up quality angles and gimmicks like Hassan and Daviri. Isn't that right Vince.
Belated warning:- The above post may contain sarcasm.
Yeah, those figures include House Shows and stuff, so it brings the average down quite a bit.
Still, it would still be a poor average im guessing even if it was based on Smackdown, Raw & PPV's. I mean, the shows in Japan probably got a higher attendance than a regular show of Smackdown or Raw in America.
Still, it would still be a poor average im guessing even if it was based on Smackdown, Raw & PPV's. I mean, the shows in Japan probably got a higher attendance than a regular show of Smackdown or Raw in America.
If only Raw, Smackdown, and PPVs were counted, the average would be a lot higher, but I'm expecting that house shows are also counted, bringing it down a lot, as they'll be in rubbish little arenas in the middle if some inbred hick town, heh.
They are clever with the camera angles the way they make it look like so many in the crowd
Thought they got at least 15,000 in those stadiums.
My local rugby team get a higher attendance than 4,000!
My local rugby team get a higher attendance than 4,000!
The average attendance for 2004 for WWE was 3,862, as compared to 2003, which was 4,537.
NODQ.com was my source. Reckon the WWE is going to wake up? That'll be down to 100 in a few years if they carry on like this...tbh, 4,537 isn't that good either...anyone know what it was back in the day? 1997 for eg?
NODQ.com was my source. Reckon the WWE is going to wake up? That'll be down to 100 in a few years if they carry on like this...tbh, 4,537 isn't that good either...anyone know what it was back in the day? 1997 for eg?