The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
> Cao wrote:
> Let's not forget who commented on the size of their niece's
> breasts...
>
> She isn't my niece and the comment I made was that she offered me a
> grope and I refused - I only mentioned the size when someone asked.
> It's not exactly the same, is it?
What's this I hear? It's all getting a bit controversial and complicated isn't it? To be honest I really know nothing about this, but if I'm not being mistaken someone is sort of approaching the status of almost hypocrite?
Oh. No, then.
Another thing has just occured-maybe she wanted to do it?
> That said, commenting on and actually sticking ones head in between 'em and
> going "fwububububububub" are two wildly different things.
Hahaha!
> It's not a fact, he has only been accused of it.
True, but when you leave a country and refuse to go back to face the charge, it does rather lead one to draw conclusions.
> So libel is worse than statutory rape? He's allowed to give evidence
> from a different country because someone said some naughty things
> about him, but at the same time the judge who allowed it ignores the
> fact he had sex with a minor.
It's not a fact, he has only been accused of it.
> Let's not forget who commented on the size of their niece's breasts...
This REALLY made me laugh...
That said, commenting on and actually sticking ones head in between 'em and going "fwububububububub" are two wildly different things.
> Let's not forget who commented on the size of their niece's breasts...
She isn't my niece and the comment I made was that she offered me a grope and I refused - I only mentioned the size when someone asked. It's not exactly the same, is it?