The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
have u heard bout the main event the wwe are thinkin bout jbl vs the rock for wwe title what do ya think bout dat
Page:
Curry_Man wrote:
> Nah, the occasional Rock segment is OK, as long as he doesn't main
> event any big PPVs.
Every now and then. Maybe about one every three months or so. I dolike his mic talent but not the biggest of fans of his in the ring work because I feel he has a slightly limited move set. I know others do but it was just the Rock that I picked up on first.
> Nah, the occasional Rock segment is OK, as long as he doesn't main
> event any big PPVs.
Every now and then. Maybe about one every three months or so. I dolike his mic talent but not the biggest of fans of his in the ring work because I feel he has a slightly limited move set. I know others do but it was just the Rock that I picked up on first.
Was it supposed to make sense? :-s
dont think so lipe :S
thechelskikid wrote:
> rather have muhhamed hassan as champ than triple h. Triple h cant even
> do basic stunt like moves e.g everyone falls of the ladder when they
> got the belt triple h climbs
Was that supposed to be funny?
> rather have muhhamed hassan as champ than triple h. Triple h cant even
> do basic stunt like moves e.g everyone falls of the ladder when they
> got the belt triple h climbs
Was that supposed to be funny?
rather have muhhamed hassan as champ than triple h. Triple h cant even do basic stunt like moves e.g everyone falls of the ladder when they got the belt triple h climbs
And so it was written that 2005 would be much of the same. Barring an injury to Triple Nasal, of course. (Please God, book HHH in as many matches with Batista/Snitsky et al, as possible)
Very_Metal wrote:
> i refer you to 2002/2003 i think it was.. that was pretty much the
> situation.
It's true. When the split of the World title came in September 2002, only Triple H and Shawn Michaels had the title in 2002. Michaels only had it for a month. Triple H also had the Undisputed title for a bit earlier on.
2003 was all Triple H until Goldberg in September, and then lost it in December to Triple H again.
> i refer you to 2002/2003 i think it was.. that was pretty much the
> situation.
It's true. When the split of the World title came in September 2002, only Triple H and Shawn Michaels had the title in 2002. Michaels only had it for a month. Triple H also had the Undisputed title for a bit earlier on.
2003 was all Triple H until Goldberg in September, and then lost it in December to Triple H again.
i refer you to 2002/2003 i think it was.. that was pretty much the situation.
> Cong_Van_Man wrote:
>
> WWE plans - HHH holds the belt for majority of the year.
>
> Dropping it for just a couple of weeks, (to shawn michaels)
> only in order to win it back
> again and up that all important x-Times world champion statistic.
That actually sounds extremely interesting.
>
> WWE plans - HHH holds the belt for majority of the year.
>
> Dropping it for just a couple of weeks, (to shawn michaels)
> only in order to win it back
> again and up that all important x-Times world champion statistic.
That actually sounds extremely interesting.
further amendment:
Cong_Van_Man wrote:
> WWE plans - HHH holds the belt for majority of the year.
>
> Dropping it for just a couple of weeks, (to shawn michaels)
> only in order to win it back
> again and up that all important x-Times world champion statistic.
Cong_Van_Man wrote:
> WWE plans - HHH holds the belt for majority of the year.
>
> Dropping it for just a couple of weeks, (to shawn michaels)
> only in order to win it back
> again and up that all important x-Times world champion statistic.
Page: