Viewing Thread:
"Told You So!"

[URL]http://home.netscape.com/redir.adp?_dci_url=http%3a%2f%2fcnn%2enetscape%2ecnn%2ecom%2fnews%2fstory%2ejsp%3ffloc%3dne%2dus%2d12%2dl5%26flok%3dFF%2dRTO%2drontz%26idq%3d%2fff%2fstory%2f0002%252F20041125%252F0916754813%2ehtm%26sc%3drontz%26photoid%3d20041123BAG08D&_wps_s=mb%5fhlm1%5fu%5f2[/URL]

These Insurgents aren't nice people. They Americans and Iraq National Guard found Chemical Weapons Lab, manned and running, until they captured them. There was instructions on how to make biological weapons, but none had been made yet. They had the capability.....

Makes you think who is supplying the insurgents, and the top suppliers of them should be annahilated, coz dying of Anthrax don't sound pretty nice....

is this like the last weapons factory they found??
you remember, the aspirin factory.....

blurgh

I don't see why they'd want to use Anthrax... It's a pretty poor disease to use as a weapon.

There isn't really any disease that's an effective weapon... Just blowing things up is a far better way to go about things.

Pandaemonium wrote:
> Fozz wrote:
> If there was no indication the lab was used to produce chemical
> weapons then why did Netscape describe it as a chemical weapons lab?
> I hate news thingeys sometimes.
>
> Netscape? The web Browser?
> Anyway. It's called "spin". Selective assembly of fact.

well it was on the netscape network, so I was assuming.

SHEEPY wrote:
> No, the other one.
>
> " I told you so yada shuffle shuffle "

Aha! I see. :D

No, the other one.

" I told you so yada shuffle shuffle "

Shut it. :)

SHEEPY wrote:
> Oh shut the hell up.

Me?

Oh shut the hell up.

Fozz wrote:
> If there was no indication the lab was used to produce chemical
> weapons then why did Netscape describe it as a chemical weapons lab?
> I hate news thingeys sometimes.

Netscape? The web Browser?
Anyway. It's called "spin". Selective assembly of fact.