The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
So there is no link, and it was all a big scare.
OI! Mail, explain yourself please!
What? No answer?
Oh well, let's suck up the next load of crap....
OI! Mail, explain yourself please!
What? No answer?
Oh well, let's suck up the next load of crap....
They win too, because they still sell millions of copies to morons.
Everyone wins.
Except the Mail/Express.
BURN!!!!
Except the Mail/Express.
BURN!!!!
Me too though.
I agree with your fact.
Consequently, I win.
See?
Consequently, I win.
See?
I agree. My point was, The Lancet have already acknowledged that it was a falsehood when they took the big step of apologising and admitting they should never have published it.
Yes, but the Lancet has a reputable and some way honest institution.
And it's job is to print articles relating to medical issues.
but the Mail......MUST BURN!!11!
And it's job is to print articles relating to medical issues.
but the Mail......MUST BURN!!11!
The Lancet did apologise for ever publishing the initial article that started it all off.
So there is no link, and it was all a big scare.
OI! Mail, explain yourself please!
What? No answer?
Oh well, let's suck up the next load of crap....
OI! Mail, explain yourself please!
What? No answer?
Oh well, let's suck up the next load of crap....