The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
...and css compliant.
But what is the standard I should be aiming for? XHTML 2?
Sorry if this is a silly question. Still, the site is currently looking damn good....
But what is the standard I should be aiming for? XHTML 2?
Sorry if this is a silly question. Still, the site is currently looking damn good....
...and css compliant.
But what is the standard I should be aiming for? XHTML 2?
Sorry if this is a silly question. Still, the site is currently looking damn good....
But what is the standard I should be aiming for? XHTML 2?
Sorry if this is a silly question. Still, the site is currently looking damn good....
Isn't it XHTML 4.0?
Currently, for guranteed support:
xHTML 1.0 trans or Strict
xHTML 1.1 is fine, but can only be in Strict and in't supported widely yet.
xHTML 2.0 Hasn't been finalized yet, and god help us all when they do!!
xHTML 1.0 trans or Strict
xHTML 1.1 is fine, but can only be in Strict and in't supported widely yet.
xHTML 2.0 Hasn't been finalized yet, and god help us all when they do!!
XHTML is only up to version 1.2 isn't it?
Afternoon wrote:
> XHTML is only up to version 1.2 isn't it?
nope... tis 1.0, 1.1 Module-based XHTML, 1.0 Second Edition & 2.0 (In Progress)
> XHTML is only up to version 1.2 isn't it?
nope... tis 1.0, 1.1 Module-based XHTML, 1.0 Second Edition & 2.0 (In Progress)
Thank god for that. I nearly had a hissy fit with MM's xHTML 4.0!!!!!!
Excellent, so my entire site is xHTML 1.1 Strict.
Quite satsfying considering I've only been using Css / Mysql / PHP / xhtml or less than a month. (naff, html only previously, I'm redesigning the company website for the future).
Cheers all.
Excellent, so my entire site is xHTML 1.1 Strict.
Quite satsfying considering I've only been using Css / Mysql / PHP / xhtml or less than a month. (naff, html only previously, I'm redesigning the company website for the future).
Cheers all.
monkey_man wrote:
> Isn't it XHTML 4.0?
HTML is at 4.01 I believe, with no further development of the HTML specification.
> Isn't it XHTML 4.0?
HTML is at 4.01 I believe, with no further development of the HTML specification.