The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Well I must say it didn't wash down with me, how can someone say there going to bring down taxes yet can't name one single tax there going to cut. Surley, if they had a plan to stick with tight spending, then they would know with that plan an estimate of how much they would be saving, and in turn with the estimated savings, they should be working out which taxes they would be able to cut. Without them doing this it surley indicates they havn't thought through there supposed plan at all, otherwise they would surley have been able to name at least one of theese tax cuts. Untill they name the taxes they will cut, which they havn't, I can't see why I sould beleve them in what there saying.
> Hedfix wrote:
>
> The general population is really now that stupid?
>
>
> Yup :-)
Bye BBC, thanks for trying.
Welcome to Murdoch's 'never mind the war on terror and the blatant lies here's some t!ts!'
and when I say 'welcome' I mean I will be sitting in a big tank writing 'welcome' on the shells before....
well you get the picture.
If I were a teacher for Politics, I'd give us a D-, See Me, an unhappy face, then rip all the shoddy work up and tell them to do it again. Could do better.
> The general population is really now that stupid?
Yup :-)
> 'Cut beaurocracy' is another favourite.
Mmm ... in a TV interview, some sweaty MP said 'fat beaurocracy' at least 15 times in 5 minutes.
> Any party that says they'll get rid of the TV license will win.
The general population is really now that stupid?
> 4% more and the Lib Dem's will be the party of opposition.
Except the won't because FPTP means that they need to get a big enough share to win seats, not votes. Anyone remember what happened in 1983? Labour only got 3% more than the Liberals vote wise. They got more than a hundred more seats.