Viewing Thread:
"The world's strongest boy"

Channel 5 at the moment. It's quite scary.

Did the boy (Richard Sandrak) take steroids, as was suggested in the film? I don't think he did. I think his physique was down to genes and tons of training. And there's no proof that he has taken steroids.
But God, that Tiny Tarzan film looks crap. I hope it never sees the light of day.

Dr Cheese wrote:
> so what about this kid then
>
> 1 % body fat and pound for pound the strongest person alive
>
>
> wow that's some achivment for a kid that has been allowed no social
> life and fun
>
> maybe his dad should recieve some form of therapy

Don't worry, his kid will kick his ass in a few years time.

Is this that little American kid with Arnold Schwarzenegger-like muscles (for his age...) and a six-pack and everything?

I saw a thing about him in one of the 'papers last year or the year before - it really made me feel sick.

And, basically, after what the experts said on how he's been forced through it by his parents, he'll practically be crippled later in life.

I do object to kids who get pushed into things by their parents. You see it with the american beauty pagents, with 11 year olds who spend 5 hours in makeup and have fake tans. Often this is the parent pushing a child to make up for said parents lack of achievement. Hmm reminds me i need to go out and do something. Been a bit lazy recently.

so what about this kid then

1 % body fat and pound for pound the strongest person alive


wow that's some achivment for a kid that has been allowed no social life and fun

maybe his dad should recieve some form of therapy

English_Bloke wrote:

> What? It was deep, man.

Sarcasm you could cut with a knife, there.

who in there right mind would allow an eleven year old boy to lift weights?

Tanoy wrote:
> munn wrote:
> You're assuming I didn't get it and was being sarcastic to it, but,
> alas, I did get it, and I was congratulating him on such a fine
> piece
> of work.
>
> The point is, it wasn't a fine piece of work!! It was a simple
> statement as he later himself acknowledged, but you acted like he'd
> done something really clever which was how we knew you were faking
> it! Moron.

How did he acknowledge it?
He said he thought it was deep, how do you know he was being sarcastic?
Maybe he was deeply upset and traumatised, as I can't see him acknowledging his simplicity by saying "I thought it was deep man" you just can't stand the fact that you are wrong, and thus you make up agreements he's made with you to try and win.

But you're forgetting, I'm better tahn you, and that was clever.

Don't lead him on, Blokey.

Squall wrote:

> I think you should shut your mouth now.


You think a lot of things, but no one particularly gives a flying foot do they?