The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I've got the border around an image - which is also a link - set to '1' on purpose, and it's coming up as the nasty blue default border colour. I've put alink='#FFFFFF' and vlink='#FFFFFF' in the tag, but what's the CSS for it? Can't be bothered to look it up.
Also, page margin CSS please.
Also, page margin CSS please.
Page:
Grix Thraves wrote:
> And by that thinking, someone HAS to have some sort of contact with
> Katie Fey. I'd very much like to get in touch.
I didnt know who this was so i done a google image search. Im glad nobody else was standing around when the results popped up.
> And by that thinking, someone HAS to have some sort of contact with
> Katie Fey. I'd very much like to get in touch.
I didnt know who this was so i done a google image search. Im glad nobody else was standing around when the results popped up.
Yeah, all of my friends know about Saffron Walden too..
You know, it does have a massive sign off the A1. Bigger than Cambridge, I kid ye not.
You know, it does have a massive sign off the A1. Bigger than Cambridge, I kid ye not.
I think maybe the six degrees (or is it seven?) of seperation, thanks to the internet, has suddenly plummeted to some really low number.
And by that thinking, someone HAS to have some sort of contact with Katie Fey. I'd very much like to get in touch.
And by that thinking, someone HAS to have some sort of contact with Katie Fey. I'd very much like to get in touch.
Can someone explain to me how my town, whcih only has ~12,000 residents, is somehow known by /everyone/ I meet, in one way or another?
Saffron Walden: Centre of the Universe
Saffron Walden: Centre of the Universe
Tyla wrote:
> Slap him with the Cod of usability
i know that's supposed to be "code", but that conjours a far better mental image :)
> Slap him with the Cod of usability
i know that's supposed to be "code", but that conjours a far better mental image :)
GD started supporting GIFs a few weeks ago, when the patents were released. Try upgrading.
Bah, now I'm having problems with this. I've got my main image, and I want to make a thumb for it whilst running the script to upload the original. I've had a few goes, but I don't think it's got the GD for Gifs - that's what the error message says. Any other way I can make a 100 x 75 image (any format) from the path posted by the form?
Tyla wrote:
> Thats a really arrogant assumption which is totally untrue.
Of course it's untrue, but that was his insight into it. Looked up 'imagecreatefromgif' on PHP.net - should be handy.
> Thats a really arrogant assumption which is totally untrue.
Of course it's untrue, but that was his insight into it. Looked up 'imagecreatefromgif' on PHP.net - should be handy.
monkey_man wrote:
> That's the bloke's fault. On his old site he had quite small images,
> so when I set up his image upload thing he decided to put up massive
> images instead! Only 5 per page though, and his clients are probably
> prepared to wait for the images. Never had a problem with my body
> tag before. The PHP beore it is fine, and I've got to put a cookie
> in there, so that'll be before the body tag anyway.
you can set the PHP to generate thumbnails of the images he uploads saving a lot of hassle. Just explain to the guy that he has about 8 seconds to convince people to stay, at this rate, even on my 10Mb connection, he'll be lucky!
You should also put your bodytag in the correct place too, it's invalid mark-up to have it where you do now. HTML has a basic structure which should be kept to.
You could also cut own on the load times buy converting the site to CSS, which would only take about 10mins.
>his clients are probably prepared to wait for the images.
Thats a really arrogant assumption which is totally untrue. As I mentioned before, users expect everything there, in their face in under 10secs, and thats on 56K connections! Slap him with the Cod of usability, andif all else fails, send Zeldman round with a shotgun.
> That's the bloke's fault. On his old site he had quite small images,
> so when I set up his image upload thing he decided to put up massive
> images instead! Only 5 per page though, and his clients are probably
> prepared to wait for the images. Never had a problem with my body
> tag before. The PHP beore it is fine, and I've got to put a cookie
> in there, so that'll be before the body tag anyway.
you can set the PHP to generate thumbnails of the images he uploads saving a lot of hassle. Just explain to the guy that he has about 8 seconds to convince people to stay, at this rate, even on my 10Mb connection, he'll be lucky!
You should also put your bodytag in the correct place too, it's invalid mark-up to have it where you do now. HTML has a basic structure which should be kept to.
You could also cut own on the load times buy converting the site to CSS, which would only take about 10mins.
>his clients are probably prepared to wait for the images.
Thats a really arrogant assumption which is totally untrue. As I mentioned before, users expect everything there, in their face in under 10secs, and thats on 56K connections! Slap him with the Cod of usability, andif all else fails, send Zeldman round with a shotgun.
[URL]http://www.rc-fp.com[/URL]
Changed since originally posted.
Changed since originally posted.
Page: