The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
i saw one of these once so decided to do one.for starters the first 10 people who post in a message are going to be the judges.then i will put down about 20 battles (example:jak(1)vs
solid snake)(obvious win for snake)(the(1)means from the first game.
u also u say why or if u have a good bit of time how(u have to say why at least).i will send a message listing the names of judges.
solid snake)(obvious win for snake)(the(1)means from the first game.
u also u say why or if u have a good bit of time how(u have to say why at least).i will send a message listing the names of judges.
Page:
I suggest disembowling yourself with your unused can of deoderant.
character wars
final fantasy fantic ,squall(ff8)vs tidus(ffx)
coin,solid snake (mgs1)vs prince of persia(1)
surrealguy ,jak(3)vs jak(2)
kr ,sonic vs jak(1)
it is not you its me ,raiden(2)vs auron(ffx)
final fantasy fantic ,squall(ff8)vs tidus(ffx)
coin,solid snake (mgs1)vs prince of persia(1)
surrealguy ,jak(3)vs jak(2)
kr ,sonic vs jak(1)
it is not you its me ,raiden(2)vs auron(ffx)
okay 6 will have to do
come on somebody
what do u mean
what do u mean
Ah, good times... Good times...
I remember doing something like this about two years ago.
I had no social life ;)
I had no social life ;)
It wouldn't affect the voting one bit.
The generic SONY poster is just as stupid as the next; post range varies from "Oh, Snake ro>
Ugh.
The generic SONY poster is just as stupid as the next; post range varies from "Oh, Snake ro>
Ugh.
No, I'm not.
And that'd make it even worse than a voting system.
And that'd make it even worse than a voting system.
Yawn.
Page: