Viewing Thread:
"King Arthur: Great film!"

The movie is great. Lots of action and good acting. It's completely different to other King Arthur movies. It was set in the end of Roman Britain because of new evidence found. Even if the film is historically incorrect its still enjoyable.

Special effects were good. Not to long and fast paced. The actor from Hornblower was good.I would of prefered if he had of filmed another Hornblower episode instead.

I recommend that you see the film. I ignored some of the bad reviews and enjoyed the film. The film is good but I would predicted only a selected audience will enjoy it. See the film anyway.

Has anyone else seen this film?
What do you think of it?

I will check it out sometime, to see whether your opinion is valid

which everyone's is, of course

LOTR is too long to watch at the cinema but good length for DVD.
King Arthur isn't to short and isn't to long. I still recommend this film.

The Matrix, I agree. LOTR is too long

The storyline is abit weak but the action makes up for it. Ok its not as good as LOTR or the Matrix. But not all films are going to be.

I think it will be good, trailers look superb, cant place judgement yet though, will after I've seen it.

I heard it was one of those films where although there's loads of action, you end up with the camera pointing at the sky and stuff as it's only a 12? True?

It depends on what type of film you like.

255 wrote:
> Lots of action and good acting.

Hohohohohohohohohhohohohohoh

I recommend no-one sees King Arthur, cos its complete and utter crap. I cant remember the times my mind just switched off because theres nothing in this film that got me excited. I knew from the first 10 minutes of the film it would be bad. I would have rather spent my money watching 13 goin on 30 or whatever it is.

255 wrote:
> Not to long...
> I would of prefered if he...
> I would predicted only a selected audience will enjoy it.

You surprise us.