The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
> Turbonutter wrote:
> Hm the concept of burn "quality" is very strange. For data
> discs there is no question of quality - it's either perfect or
> corrupt, the essence of binary.
>
> This isn't actually true - word size on a CD is 14 bit, 8 as usual
> plus 6 bits error correction. Most discs are far from perfect, but
> due to the error correction bits they still work perfectly. Slower
> burn speeds do eradicate imperfections.
Imperfections or not you still have the error correction which is designed to eliminate them. And it succeeds. Your discs may need to use less error correction bits, but nevertheless, your data is still exactly the same.
Colin
> Hm the concept of burn "quality" is very strange. For data
> discs there is no question of quality - it's either perfect or
> corrupt, the essence of binary.
This isn't actually true - word size on a CD is 14 bit, 8 as usual plus 6 bits error correction. Most discs are far from perfect, but due to the error correction bits they still work perfectly. Slower burn speeds do eradicate imperfections.
Some people seem to think that audio WAV files will be more accurate when burned slower on to an audio CD, but your burner still performs CRC checks on the data it burns and will throw up errors if the audio isn't 100% perfect - and I very, very rarely get any errors when I burn audio CDs.
At 52x.