The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
[URL]http://www.webelectricals.co.uk/cgi-bin/webelectricals.storefront/EN/Product/1337[/URL]
Well mainly TV, in fact all TV and only a small percent monitor. HDTV, Progressive Scan.
2 weeks of Friday!
Well mainly TV, in fact all TV and only a small percent monitor. HDTV, Progressive Scan.
2 weeks of Friday!
Page:
Received it yesterday and it's f**king gorgeous chuck.
Haven't had time to wall mount it yet due to football being on and having to remove all the wall mounted DVD storage.
Only have 1 defect/lit pixel which you can only view from around about a foot away and for a 32" LCD HDTV I am supposedly extremely lucky as the majority have around 15-20 on a screen this size which the manufacturers see as an "acceptable" level.
So overall, well worth the dosh, haven't had a proper chance to test the HDTV with the Xbox and DVD player but the Progressive Scan is impressive on standard TV programs.
Haven't had time to wall mount it yet due to football being on and having to remove all the wall mounted DVD storage.
Only have 1 defect/lit pixel which you can only view from around about a foot away and for a 32" LCD HDTV I am supposedly extremely lucky as the majority have around 15-20 on a screen this size which the manufacturers see as an "acceptable" level.
So overall, well worth the dosh, haven't had a proper chance to test the HDTV with the Xbox and DVD player but the Progressive Scan is impressive on standard TV programs.
I didn't click the link or read anything about your HDTV.
I was just commenting on response times.
Although 32"...wow.
I was just commenting on response times.
Although 32"...wow.
Ahh rightyo, that explains it.
The Samsung SM913N is only a 19" monitor.
As a 32" HDTV? I find that hard to believe seeing as Sharp Aquos are currently the market leaders for LCD TV.
the Samsung SM913N is 8ms apparently.
That's some serious premature ejaculation.
ms not mm ;)
Mine is 16ms too :)
SpongeBobSpermPants wrote:
> 16ms.
Wow, thats really quite impressive.
> 16ms.
Wow, thats really quite impressive.
Page: