The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Out of interest I would mind, and would rather pay that little extra for the quality of uninterupted TV. But it's your opinions which count so let your opinions be herd.
That I do not like. All the programs I use to like on the BBC are now gone and are repeated on UKGold or I own on DVD.
I would prefer to not pay for BBC channels and BBC radio channels that I will never watch or listen to. One day they'll stop the fee, hopefully in my life time.
> I don't watch TV, it's crap.
*cough*
Living TV?
> I want a Bivan Brothers reality show.
Well there are eight of us Bivan Brothers, so it can be arranged.
> the sagacious one wrote:
> BBC 3: Monkey Dust. Worth the license fee alone. The rest, pants.
>
> Little Britain?
Hmmm, sometimes. The Tom Baker voice overs are usually really funny and the actual skits are hit and miss. There are a few too many camp characters for my liking, not because I am homophobic but it is too simple a form of comedy.
> BBC 3: Monkey Dust. Worth the license fee alone. The rest, pants.
Little Britain?
BBC4 has it's moments; the docucomedy about Dali and the surrealist trial he underwent was corking. We should definitely keep the licence fee in my opinion. Giving advertisers more power in TV? Nuh-uh; look at what happened to Bill Hicks' last tv performance. It was excised from the Letterman show due to pressure from the advertisors. Not that the BBC are perfect by any means, but I'd rather have those bumbling idiot governors making decisions than a bunch of (^&*ing salesmen and marketeers.
I wonder what I could commission on the BBC using my license fee (approx £100 isn't it?)? Maybe we should pool our fees and demand that we are allowed to make our own show.
But the good thing about the license - MotD with no adverts.
Even if Leeds are in division one nowadays...
Thank God for Sky