The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
How comes Bill Clinton has to face public humiliation when his legal case of getting a suckjob is made available to the everyman, but when George Bush is accused of ignoring messages that could have saved thousands of lives, no one's allowed to see or hear what went on in the meeting? Which one is more important to the nation's welfare - suckjob or bombhthreat?
Mr Snuggly wrote:
> Which one is more important to the nation's welfare - suckjob or bombhthreat?
*****
It depends who's giving the 'suckjob' ...
> Which one is more important to the nation's welfare - suckjob or bombhthreat?
*****
It depends who's giving the 'suckjob' ...
Which 'side' (i.e media/Govt.) chose not to show what happened?
FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> Isn't that all politics is about these days?
Yep.
And Snuggly, Clinton's term may have been up, but his party still stood in the election lead by Al Gore.
> Isn't that all politics is about these days?
Yep.
And Snuggly, Clinton's term may have been up, but his party still stood in the election lead by Al Gore.
Edgy wrote:
> That's why - it was Bush's plan to get into power. Humiliate the
> leader of the opposing party to gain support for your own.
Isn't that all politics is about these days?
> That's why - it was Bush's plan to get into power. Humiliate the
> leader of the opposing party to gain support for your own.
Isn't that all politics is about these days?
Clinton's adminstration was up already, he'd had his 8 years I believe. Bush had nothing to do with it. My point is, surely finding out whether the President of the USA possibly knew something about his country's biggest terrorist attack before it happened (and failed to act on it) is surely more in the public interest than whether Clinton got his roots rinsed.
That's why - it was Bush's plan to get into power. Humiliate the leader of the opposing party to gain support for your own.
I really don't know why America wanted to turn Clinton into some pervert figure.
He was the best President they'd had for a long time, and not just because he didn't want to play War with the little countries...
He was the best President they'd had for a long time, and not just because he didn't want to play War with the little countries...
Because.
One had semen on a dress...
THey both involved sucking.
One had semen on a dress...
THey both involved sucking.
How comes Bill Clinton has to face public humiliation when his legal case of getting a suckjob is made available to the everyman, but when George Bush is accused of ignoring messages that could have saved thousands of lives, no one's allowed to see or hear what went on in the meeting? Which one is more important to the nation's welfare - suckjob or bombhthreat?