Viewing Thread:
"Band of Brothers."

Thinking of picking this up tommorow, so is it any good? What is it like with LIVE? Many players on LIVE, etc?


Edit: Crap - Brothers in Arms.
My Bad.

Communist Jim wrote:
> The 3 tag-alongs are pretty smart.
> Its the other team-mate you have that isnt.

Yeah, they're more useless than anything, sometimes an "accidental" grenade is in order...

The 3 tag-alongs are pretty smart.
Its the other team-mate you have that isnt.

Greeny Greenwell wrote:
> its good.
>
> multiplayer is a let down to me though tbh. nly 2 players??? try a
> bit harder Ubi.
>
> Halo 2 is still far better.

Yeah its 4 players as Jimbo over there *points* said, and its still good because each player has 3 tag alongs so really there are 12 players cutting about.

Must have played for about 3 hours yesterday.

I like this alot. I have Call of Duty for the PC and when it came out on the Xbox i was really disapointed with it. But this make sup for Call of Duty and yes it does make you use tactis more then alot of FPS's.

4 Players online.
The online is excellent - I really enjoy it.

its good.

multiplayer is a let down to me though tbh. nly 2 players??? try a bit harder Ubi.

Halo 2 is still far better.

I'll probably get it one day but certainly not anytime soon.

I got it anyway, I am really impressed.
The multiplayer is excellent, really tactical and is fun to watch aswell, its a nice break from Halo. Single player is excellent and the dialouge is great.
Well worth getting it.

I'm avoiding this

a) because there are too many other --> non WWII <-- first person shooters I have my eye on
b) in WWII shooters, the team based multiplayer modes are almost impossible to enjoy due to the fact you can NEVER see if a guy's on your team or not until it's too late
c) your mum