The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Edit: Crap - Brothers in Arms.
My Bad.
> The 3 tag-alongs are pretty smart.
> Its the other team-mate you have that isnt.
Yeah, they're more useless than anything, sometimes an "accidental" grenade is in order...
Its the other team-mate you have that isnt.
> its good.
>
> multiplayer is a let down to me though tbh. nly 2 players??? try a
> bit harder Ubi.
>
> Halo 2 is still far better.
Yeah its 4 players as Jimbo over there *points* said, and its still good because each player has 3 tag alongs so really there are 12 players cutting about.
The online is excellent - I really enjoy it.
multiplayer is a let down to me though tbh. nly 2 players??? try a bit harder Ubi.
Halo 2 is still far better.
The multiplayer is excellent, really tactical and is fun to watch aswell, its a nice break from Halo. Single player is excellent and the dialouge is great.
Well worth getting it.
a) because there are too many other --> non WWII <-- first person shooters I have my eye on
b) in WWII shooters, the team based multiplayer modes are almost impossible to enjoy due to the fact you can NEVER see if a guy's on your team or not until it's too late
c) your mum