The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I really hate lord of the rings! it has brought us 2 things, orlando bloom (good God NOOOOO!!!!!!!!) and as if that wasn't bad enough a race of nerds who would rather die defending its name than realise that any average book made into such an expensive film with rubbish actors (except that guy who plays that guy who was grey but turned white - due to too much gay sex or something) was all terrible!!!
Who can like such a film!!!
Who can think it is a great movie!!
Who can say that "they were brilliant to come up with something like that"
Nothing about the Lord of the Rings movies is good.
They have brought pain into my life, and because friends wanted to see them i saw all 3 films..... thats over 9 hours of my life wasted. I will so regret that on my death bed. But what's worse is people want to see the extented versions. They watch them again and agian and agian and again!!!!
What is good about this :
Film 1
"short hairy poppets have party. King Evilalot goes to war with all life. The best actor dies. The gremlins attack again. Lolypop and suckem'n'see trunddle over the hill of light to mount bad-egg, via swamp stinky poo, river flowseastdontyaknow, over the sea of cumador.
Film 2
"all hope is lost until Dum and Dee and an army of talking trees attack an army production facility like in C&C. The great knight sir ballsgalore lead all man kind over the mountain of fire through the river of eels to the castle of vipirearama, where he, by himself, killed all 32 trillion scro warriors who were sent to kill them for no reason, thus saving humanity, for another little while. He marched to mount freedom and talked to preist godly about his son dild oorg asims."
Film 3
"All life has backs to the walls tryin not to be bugg**ed. But the bad man forgot about that army of ghosts that can not be killed and save all life, until Lolypop and Suckem'n'see finally through an onion ring in some blow hole. Everybody except the best actor go to a dock and have an orgie of 'happy-love' then suckem'n'see dates a real girl entering into a life of sexual oppression"
I really hate it.
Anybody who says otherwise take it elsewhere this is for people who hate them and want to celebrate it!! You get to celebrate liking them, so i will enjoy hating them!!!
Who can like such a film!!!
Who can think it is a great movie!!
Who can say that "they were brilliant to come up with something like that"
Nothing about the Lord of the Rings movies is good.
They have brought pain into my life, and because friends wanted to see them i saw all 3 films..... thats over 9 hours of my life wasted. I will so regret that on my death bed. But what's worse is people want to see the extented versions. They watch them again and agian and agian and again!!!!
What is good about this :
Film 1
"short hairy poppets have party. King Evilalot goes to war with all life. The best actor dies. The gremlins attack again. Lolypop and suckem'n'see trunddle over the hill of light to mount bad-egg, via swamp stinky poo, river flowseastdontyaknow, over the sea of cumador.
Film 2
"all hope is lost until Dum and Dee and an army of talking trees attack an army production facility like in C&C. The great knight sir ballsgalore lead all man kind over the mountain of fire through the river of eels to the castle of vipirearama, where he, by himself, killed all 32 trillion scro warriors who were sent to kill them for no reason, thus saving humanity, for another little while. He marched to mount freedom and talked to preist godly about his son dild oorg asims."
Film 3
"All life has backs to the walls tryin not to be bugg**ed. But the bad man forgot about that army of ghosts that can not be killed and save all life, until Lolypop and Suckem'n'see finally through an onion ring in some blow hole. Everybody except the best actor go to a dock and have an orgie of 'happy-love' then suckem'n'see dates a real girl entering into a life of sexual oppression"
I really hate it.
Anybody who says otherwise take it elsewhere this is for people who hate them and want to celebrate it!! You get to celebrate liking them, so i will enjoy hating them!!!
Page:
Zhuge Liang wrote:
> Emitime wrote:
> Zhuge Liang wrote:
> you asses, the hobit (nothing to do with wars) was written before
> ww2.
> The others supposedly started were not finished until 12 years after
> the war ended. Maybe.... just maybe willy lickers the books took
> some if not all influence from this consisdering he was a soldier!
> >
> >
> Yet to be an argument against my point only more half assed insults
> at me.
>
> A quote from the foreword in LOTR.
>
> "the composition of The Lord of the Rings went on at
> intervals during the years 1936 to 1949"
>
> Yes. Of course it was based on WWII, 3 years before it started.
>
>
> Hello??? dumb blind dip-sh*t the books were not finished and
> published until 12 years after the war.
Uh... He actually finished writing it 4 years after the war. It took a further 6 years to be first published.
But as said before, he started writing it 3 years before the war, and had it all planned out, LONG, before then.
You don't just start writing a book y'know.
> In any case the films are terrible.
I'm not going to disagree with you there :)
But the books are still brilliant.
> Emitime wrote:
> Zhuge Liang wrote:
> you asses, the hobit (nothing to do with wars) was written before
> ww2.
> The others supposedly started were not finished until 12 years after
> the war ended. Maybe.... just maybe willy lickers the books took
> some if not all influence from this consisdering he was a soldier!
> >
> >
> Yet to be an argument against my point only more half assed insults
> at me.
>
> A quote from the foreword in LOTR.
>
> "the composition of The Lord of the Rings went on at
> intervals during the years 1936 to 1949"
>
> Yes. Of course it was based on WWII, 3 years before it started.
>
>
> Hello??? dumb blind dip-sh*t the books were not finished and
> published until 12 years after the war.
Uh... He actually finished writing it 4 years after the war. It took a further 6 years to be first published.
But as said before, he started writing it 3 years before the war, and had it all planned out, LONG, before then.
You don't just start writing a book y'know.
> In any case the films are terrible.
I'm not going to disagree with you there :)
But the books are still brilliant.
Chr1s wrote:
> Forza wrote:
> The vast majority of actors were already established in their
> careers
> before going into LotR, you spastic.
>
> That remark better have not been directed at me. I made no such
> accusations that they were not already established.
no-one did
> Forza wrote:
> The vast majority of actors were already established in their
> careers
> before going into LotR, you spastic.
>
> That remark better have not been directed at me. I made no such
> accusations that they were not already established.
no-one did
Forza wrote:
> The vast majority of actors were already established in their careers
> before going into LotR, you spastic.
That remark better have not been directed at me. I made no such accusations that they were not already established.
> The vast majority of actors were already established in their careers
> before going into LotR, you spastic.
That remark better have not been directed at me. I made no such accusations that they were not already established.
I heard he's currently working on some Shakespearean material.
I haven't seen the Balrog in anything since.
The vast majority of actors were already established in their careers before going into LotR, you spastic.
Zhuge Liang wrote:
> cookie monster wrote:
> Zhuge Liang wrote:
> What have any of the actors done since?
>
> Quite a few actors have been in other films since. I would name
> them,
> but i cba.
>
> They must have been good films then like troy? (lol), (in fairness
> sean bean is a good actor) but troy was rubbish too.
That idiot Orlando Bloom has been in a few things but he continues to deliver sub-standard performances.
> cookie monster wrote:
> Zhuge Liang wrote:
> What have any of the actors done since?
>
> Quite a few actors have been in other films since. I would name
> them,
> but i cba.
>
> They must have been good films then like troy? (lol), (in fairness
> sean bean is a good actor) but troy was rubbish too.
That idiot Orlando Bloom has been in a few things but he continues to deliver sub-standard performances.
In my opinion you're a load of crap, but meh.
cookie monster wrote:
> Zhuge Liang wrote:
> What have any of the actors done since?
>
> Quite a few actors have been in other films since. I would name them,
> but i cba.
They must have been good films then like troy? (lol), (in fairness sean bean is a good actor) but troy was rubbish too.
> Zhuge Liang wrote:
> What have any of the actors done since?
>
> Quite a few actors have been in other films since. I would name them,
> but i cba.
They must have been good films then like troy? (lol), (in fairness sean bean is a good actor) but troy was rubbish too.
AfroJoe wrote:
> Puddin™ wrote:
> Oh christ, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, are they not?
>
> Of course you're entitled to your own opinion. This doesn't make it
> any less crap, though.
In my opinion thats just a load of crap what you said afroJoe
> Puddin™ wrote:
> Oh christ, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, are they not?
>
> Of course you're entitled to your own opinion. This doesn't make it
> any less crap, though.
In my opinion thats just a load of crap what you said afroJoe
Page: