The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Post all your GAD related questions, queries and thank-you's here! And I guess, if you want to brag...do that here too!
Some USEFUL LINKS for Prize Award / Claims info!
[LINK=http://cheats.freeola.com/gaming/rules.php]Competition General Rules[/LINK]
[LINK=http://cheats.freeola.com/gaming/faqs.php]FAQS[/LINK]
[LINK=http://cheats.freeola.com/gaming/claim2.php]How to claim![/LINK]
Page:
pb wrote:
Now that song is going round in my head!
Haha ... thought it might ... so here it is ... again
DL wrote:
Well done to rhiannonrw ... deserved :¬)
I love Fleetwood Mac too
Post edited by DL on 21/11/2016 at 19:32.
Now that song is going round in my head!
Well done to rhiannonrw ... deserved :¬)
I love Fleetwood Mac too
Post edited by DL on 21/11/2016 at 19:32.
I love Fleetwood Mac too
Post edited by DL on 21/11/2016 at 19:32.
chasfh wrote:
how about encouragement for a new forum member who actually, clearly made an effort, for example?
I won with my first review (although it totally deserved it :) ) so that approach certainly worked with me. But now that I've hit the top 10 in the hall of fame I can put my feet up.
Ghost Killer wrote:
Yeah I totally get that.
It's difficult to not sound like a sore loser when I say this and perhaps I am but judging by the quality of the latest winner's submission and then looking at my review of Tumble its hard not be be a little upset that it lost especially from a gramatical and content standpoint. Like I said though sore loser here ha!
The site has its methods and I have to respect that.
I understand your point, but grammar etc. are not the only considerations; how about encouragement for a new forum member who actually, clearly made an effort, for example?
Like most of the "core" group here, you've had quite a few prizes, haven't you? We'd really like to see a bit more competition:-)
Yeah I totally get that.
It's difficult to not sound like a sore loser when I say this and perhaps I am but judging by the quality of the latest winner's submission and then looking at my review of Tumble its hard not be be a little upset that it lost especially from a gramatical and content standpoint. Like I said though sore loser here ha!
The site has its methods and I have to respect that.
It's difficult to not sound like a sore loser when I say this and perhaps I am but judging by the quality of the latest winner's submission and then looking at my review of Tumble its hard not be be a little upset that it lost especially from a gramatical and content standpoint. Like I said though sore loser here ha!
The site has its methods and I have to respect that.
dav2612 wrote:
It reads to me like the numbers method is only used when the other methods haven't led to a single winner. And he did say unique views when it comes to the numbers.
Spot on Dav.
We keep things as fair as we can, and we generally have a bit of discussion around the office before allocating a prize.
Ghost Killer wrote:
That's a shame especially as it seems by that ruling that numbers mean more than quality. Just a heads up that when you click a post it counts as a view every time you do it. Noticed that the other day.
It reads to me like the numbers method is only used when the other methods haven't led to a single winner. And he did say unique views when it comes to the numbers.
Warhunt wrote:
If there are multiple efforts that are viable for an award in the same period, I do have a very convoluted method of preference.
If I feel multiple efforts are deserving, I usually go by numbers. If the review has had more unique views, then that's the one I go with (again, usually!).
That's a shame especially as it seems by that ruling that numbers mean more than quality. Just a heads up that when you click a post it counts as a view every time you do it. Noticed that the other day.
Page: