The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Its true everytime I play Goldeneye on the N64 I just want to go down the road shooting anything that moves, headshots being desirable..but sarcasm aside.. do videogames make you violent,
This is a particularly relevant topic with so many of you playing GTA, so do you all feel like being a major Drug Baron, earning money on the side through prostitution, loan sharking, and selling Playstation2s on the black market???
So violence in games affecting people can only be assessed on an individual basis, and let's face it, people who go around smashing cars after playing Grand Theft Auto are just as likely to paint their body blue, stick icecream cones on their back and run around shouting 'I'm sonic'.
I tried your idea with the modified viruses as a more likely vector than Sellotape earlier on today, but they seem to be having a lot of trouble keeping the Christmas decorations up. Maybe we should both have a go at genetically modified Blu-tac and see where that gets us.
I claim my second NobelPrizeaDay!
.
Maths,Physics,Chemistry,Biology,Psycology
.
Maths being the least subjective, and so least prone to errors.. Psychology being the most subjective and most prone to errors.
.
I do try to keep an open mind, the problem with psychology is that you can`t have a true control experiment, on humans (the best we can do is twins),...as such experiments can rarely be reproduced...the science cannot be tested properly. Therefore psychology in my opinion should be taken with a pinch of salt.
You suggest good scientists should get "results, reviewing them, performing more experiments, testing, and developing a theory which can then be bourne out with further empirical evidence gathering"
How can psychologists really review most of their experiments,as the people or subjects they study are just too variable and so the experiments not repeatable.
.
You are right my comments were harsh not all psychologists are Wacko, but Freud was(..and the majority of psychologists still study his work),Also for you to say 90% of what we know about the human brain comes from psycologists ignores the contribution of Psychiatry( a differnt more precise science) and NeuroScience...both of which have contributed over 10%.
.
The best psychology has come out in the past few years..work done on cloned rats, in a controlled enviroment. But even here there is a problem infering rodent behaviour onto humans( a problem I am aware that Biology also suffers).
Also For your information Scientists have also found modified viruses to be better vetors than Sellotape.
Without psychology we wouldn't know 10% what we know today about the workings of the human brain, so they are important...
By the way, have they tried Sellotape on the p53 gene to stick it to human tissue?
I claim my NobelPrizeaDay!
Psychologists make money by being contravertial, publishing books with no scientific bases and appearing on The Big Breakfast. Psychology allows alot of freedom, there may be multiple conclusions to one experiment..and so conclusions based on some tests can be biased by the experimenters own views. This is highlighted by the theory, produced by one very famous psychologists.. that young men want to sleep with their mother and kill their father...What thats disgusting!!..but controvertial