Viewing Thread:
"StarFox"

After seeing StarFox in action I have to say it looks great. Still shots really don't do it justice; action looks fast paced and intense and the graphics are quite something, especially Fox McCloud himself, regardless of how rough they look around the edges.

It seems I judged this one too quickly as it seems to be the StarFox I was waiting, even the on-foot combat looks great, which surprised me.

Oh, and has anyone else noticed that Wario World was missing 2 worlds?

I was sick of it after a 3 minute shot on a demo pod.

It wasn't fun.


It was tedious after the first 40 minutes. And being tedious is the worst thing a game can be.

Adventures looked incredible. No doubt there. Sadly it was linear and boring. Should have been more fight moves.

I may have been very shallow, but it was fun, people saying it's a complete disaster are wrong, it may not be great, but it makes you want to complete it.

Whoops. I typed that last message wrong. It should have read:

1 4150 7}{1|\||< 17 1iC|<5 B411z

Memorandum wrote:
> I also think it licks ballz.

W0r|)

I also think it licks ballz.

I thought Adventures was very fairly criticised, looked really nice but played like a violin with no strings.

Maverick42 wrote:
It's a varied game that
> never gets boring; go for it,

That's funny as hell. You are joking right?

You ponce around in the Xbox forum telling everyone there's only a couple of good games on the system, then you come out with this comment.

I hope for your sake you were joking.

Yeah, I was talking about the new StarFox, but Adventures is unfairly criticised, so a good point...

:-D