The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'StarFox 64'.
After seeing StarFox in action I have to say it looks great. Still shots really don't do it justice; action looks fast paced and intense and the graphics are quite something, especially Fox McCloud himself, regardless of how rough they look around the edges.
It seems I judged this one too quickly as it seems to be the StarFox I was waiting, even the on-foot combat looks great, which surprised me.
Oh, and has anyone else noticed that Wario World was missing 2 worlds?
It seems I judged this one too quickly as it seems to be the StarFox I was waiting, even the on-foot combat looks great, which surprised me.
Oh, and has anyone else noticed that Wario World was missing 2 worlds?
Page:
After seeing StarFox in action I have to say it looks great. Still shots really don't do it justice; action looks fast paced and intense and the graphics are quite something, especially Fox McCloud himself, regardless of how rough they look around the edges.
It seems I judged this one too quickly as it seems to be the StarFox I was waiting, even the on-foot combat looks great, which surprised me.
Oh, and has anyone else noticed that Wario World was missing 2 worlds?
It seems I judged this one too quickly as it seems to be the StarFox I was waiting, even the on-foot combat looks great, which surprised me.
Oh, and has anyone else noticed that Wario World was missing 2 worlds?
Yeah, Starfox Adventures is pretty good. A lot of people criticise it on this site, but I had a great time from start to finish playing through and it took me a good twenty hours. It's a varied game that never gets boring; go for it, I say. But I dare say it'll go down in price soon, so wait for a bit, eh?
um, wasnt rikoss talking about the new starfox?
Yeah, I was talking about the new StarFox, but Adventures is unfairly criticised, so a good point...
:-D
:-D
Maverick42 wrote:
It's a varied game that
> never gets boring; go for it,
That's funny as hell. You are joking right?
You ponce around in the Xbox forum telling everyone there's only a couple of good games on the system, then you come out with this comment.
I hope for your sake you were joking.
It's a varied game that
> never gets boring; go for it,
That's funny as hell. You are joking right?
You ponce around in the Xbox forum telling everyone there's only a couple of good games on the system, then you come out with this comment.
I hope for your sake you were joking.
I thought Adventures was very fairly criticised, looked really nice but played like a violin with no strings.
I also think it licks ballz.
Memorandum wrote:
> I also think it licks ballz.
W0r|)
> I also think it licks ballz.
W0r|)
Whoops. I typed that last message wrong. It should have read:
1 4150 7}{1|\||< 17 1iC|<5 B411z
1 4150 7}{1|\||< 17 1iC|<5 B411z
I may have been very shallow, but it was fun, people saying it's a complete disaster are wrong, it may not be great, but it makes you want to complete it.
Page: