The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Did you know that Cybersex was illegal?
"A Scottish man has been jailed for 2 years after having Cybersex with a 13 year old girl"
I thought it was "frowned upon" by a lot of people but i didnt know it was illegal..so all you cybersexers...be warned!
"A Scottish man has been jailed for 2 years after having Cybersex with a 13 year old girl"
I thought it was "frowned upon" by a lot of people but i didnt know it was illegal..so all you cybersexers...be warned!
Page:
Jon $m!th wrote:
> Peter .K wrote:
> you never answered my question is smoking a joint illegal in
> cyberspace?
> And how can a keyboard upset someone? yeah descrimination comments
> can,but a few naughty words shouldn`t and how are the cops gonna
> track you down you`re stupid if you give away your phone number on
> the internet you don`t know who the hell you`re chatting to!!
>
> Smoking a joint in cyberspace isn't physically possible so it isn't
> illegal. Smoking one whilst on the net is illegal. If you are on a
> Webcam and you are smoking a joint it is illegal because it is real -
> but, again, it isn't technically in cyberspace.
It`s obviously illegal siting there and smoking a real joint but sitting on the computer and saying that you`re go smoke 1 can`t be illegal
> Peter .K wrote:
> you never answered my question is smoking a joint illegal in
> cyberspace?
> And how can a keyboard upset someone? yeah descrimination comments
> can,but a few naughty words shouldn`t and how are the cops gonna
> track you down you`re stupid if you give away your phone number on
> the internet you don`t know who the hell you`re chatting to!!
>
> Smoking a joint in cyberspace isn't physically possible so it isn't
> illegal. Smoking one whilst on the net is illegal. If you are on a
> Webcam and you are smoking a joint it is illegal because it is real -
> but, again, it isn't technically in cyberspace.
It`s obviously illegal siting there and smoking a real joint but sitting on the computer and saying that you`re go smoke 1 can`t be illegal
It Is Not You Its Me wrote:
> Flock wrote:
> It Is Not You Its Me wrote:
> it is the physciolgical scars they are worried about
> they can be caused in one sentence.
>
> I'm sure they can but i'd be more worried about encouraging people
> to
> think of anyone under 16 in that way, it bang out of order and just
> about excusable if you're young but anyone older should know better.
> I don't know why anyone would want someone that young when you could
> have some gorgeous 20something.
>
> Yeah, that is why the scot dude got banged up but why it may b
> illegal full stop is that people probably can cyber rape and
> emotinaly scare people then. I know i have contradicted my self but
> that does not matter, i am looking atboth sides of an arguement
You`ve a small point there,saying stuff like "i`m gonna stalk you and rape you" in a chatroom can be scary to young girls
> Flock wrote:
> It Is Not You Its Me wrote:
> it is the physciolgical scars they are worried about
> they can be caused in one sentence.
>
> I'm sure they can but i'd be more worried about encouraging people
> to
> think of anyone under 16 in that way, it bang out of order and just
> about excusable if you're young but anyone older should know better.
> I don't know why anyone would want someone that young when you could
> have some gorgeous 20something.
>
> Yeah, that is why the scot dude got banged up but why it may b
> illegal full stop is that people probably can cyber rape and
> emotinaly scare people then. I know i have contradicted my self but
> that does not matter, i am looking atboth sides of an arguement
You`ve a small point there,saying stuff like "i`m gonna stalk you and rape you" in a chatroom can be scary to young girls
Jon $m!th wrote:
> Emotionally scar someone? they choose to talk about sex over the
> internet...there is no physical damage at all and probably not even
> any mental damage - they just have to ignore that person
I think it could be classed as statutory rape, thats when both parties are consenting but one or both aren't old enough to give consent, either way trying to sexually provoke an under 16 is seriously dodgy, especially if you;re old enough to know better.
> Emotionally scar someone? they choose to talk about sex over the
> internet...there is no physical damage at all and probably not even
> any mental damage - they just have to ignore that person
I think it could be classed as statutory rape, thats when both parties are consenting but one or both aren't old enough to give consent, either way trying to sexually provoke an under 16 is seriously dodgy, especially if you;re old enough to know better.
Peter .K wrote:
> you never answered my question is smoking a joint illegal in
> cyberspace?
> And how can a keyboard upset someone? yeah descrimination comments
> can,but a few naughty words shouldn`t and how are the cops gonna
> track you down you`re stupid if you give away your phone number on
> the internet you don`t know who the hell you`re chatting to!!
Smoking a joint in cyberspace isn't physically possible so it isn't illegal. Smoking one whilst on the net is illegal. If you are on a Webcam and you are smoking a joint it is illegal because it is real - but, again, it isn't technically in cyberspace.
> you never answered my question is smoking a joint illegal in
> cyberspace?
> And how can a keyboard upset someone? yeah descrimination comments
> can,but a few naughty words shouldn`t and how are the cops gonna
> track you down you`re stupid if you give away your phone number on
> the internet you don`t know who the hell you`re chatting to!!
Smoking a joint in cyberspace isn't physically possible so it isn't illegal. Smoking one whilst on the net is illegal. If you are on a Webcam and you are smoking a joint it is illegal because it is real - but, again, it isn't technically in cyberspace.
Flock wrote:
> Peter .K wrote:
> so if someone has cybersex do you have to be like to 16 year olds?Or
> if ones 16 and the mans 35 it`s illegal right?
>
> It's completely legal, doesn't make it right but it's legal.
>
> How about smoking a joint in cyberspace is that illegal to underage
> smokers?
>
> How exactly would you do that?
You just need to say "I`m gonna go and smoke a joint" in a chatroom then you say *i`m rolling the joint now do you want some?*
> Peter .K wrote:
> so if someone has cybersex do you have to be like to 16 year olds?Or
> if ones 16 and the mans 35 it`s illegal right?
>
> It's completely legal, doesn't make it right but it's legal.
>
> How about smoking a joint in cyberspace is that illegal to underage
> smokers?
>
> How exactly would you do that?
You just need to say "I`m gonna go and smoke a joint" in a chatroom then you say *i`m rolling the joint now do you want some?*
you never answered my question is smoking a joint illegal in cyberspace?
And how can a keyboard upset someone? yeah descrimination comments can,but a few naughty words shouldn`t and how are the cops gonna track you down you`re stupid if you give away your phone number on the internet you don`t know who the hell you`re chatting to!!
And how can a keyboard upset someone? yeah descrimination comments can,but a few naughty words shouldn`t and how are the cops gonna track you down you`re stupid if you give away your phone number on the internet you don`t know who the hell you`re chatting to!!
Peter .K wrote:
> so if someone has cybersex do you have to be like to 16 year olds?Or
> if ones 16 and the mans 35 it`s illegal right?
It's completely legal, doesn't make it right but it's legal.
> How about smoking a joint in cyberspace is that illegal to underage
> smokers?
How exactly would you do that?
> so if someone has cybersex do you have to be like to 16 year olds?Or
> if ones 16 and the mans 35 it`s illegal right?
It's completely legal, doesn't make it right but it's legal.
> How about smoking a joint in cyberspace is that illegal to underage
> smokers?
How exactly would you do that?
It Is Not You Its Me wrote:
> jon
> you do not know what you are talking about. i do i researched it so
> shut up
Ha! You researched it?? of course you did. You don't know anything about it and think you do - there's a difference. I've studied Psychology and Criminal Law over cases concerning things such as rape - so shutup
> jon
> you do not know what you are talking about. i do i researched it so
> shut up
Ha! You researched it?? of course you did. You don't know anything about it and think you do - there's a difference. I've studied Psychology and Criminal Law over cases concerning things such as rape - so shutup
It Is Not You Its Me wrote:
> it is the physciolgical scars they are worried about
> they can be caused in one sentence.
I'm sure they can but i'd be more worried about encouraging people to think of anyone under 16 in that way, it bang out of order and just about excusable if you're young but anyone older should know better. I don't know why anyone would want someone that young when you could have some gorgeous 20something.
> it is the physciolgical scars they are worried about
> they can be caused in one sentence.
I'm sure they can but i'd be more worried about encouraging people to think of anyone under 16 in that way, it bang out of order and just about excusable if you're young but anyone older should know better. I don't know why anyone would want someone that young when you could have some gorgeous 20something.
It Is Not You Its Me wrote:
> It can emotinaly scar people. like rape, that is what is argued
> anywhoways.
Emotionally scar someone? they choose to talk about sex over the internet...there is no physical damage at all and probably not even any mental damage - they just have to ignore that person
> It can emotinaly scar people. like rape, that is what is argued
> anywhoways.
Emotionally scar someone? they choose to talk about sex over the internet...there is no physical damage at all and probably not even any mental damage - they just have to ignore that person
Page: