The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Continental Landscapes Ltd.
[URL]http://www.continental-landscapes.co.uk/[/URL]
Quick rebuild in 2.5 days. Not too chuffed as had to compromise with a hybrid layout, but am chuffed that it's the first SQL/ASP site I've built (ASP Sux BTW). Given it the quick once over, all seems ok in FF0.9.3 and IE6.
[URL]http://www.continental-landscapes.co.uk/[/URL]
Quick rebuild in 2.5 days. Not too chuffed as had to compromise with a hybrid layout, but am chuffed that it's the first SQL/ASP site I've built (ASP Sux BTW). Given it the quick once over, all seems ok in FF0.9.3 and IE6.
Page:
Hmmm... wrote:
> Also - as I know you are into 'standards' how come only the images on
> the main pages have ALT tags and not all images. I guess that was for
> someone else to do, right...
That'll be lack of knowledge of getting SQL to write out the alt tags at the same time as the images. Still getting to grips with the whole SQL/ASP thing. There's laso the problem that the back end CMS doesn't contain an input field for image description yet, something I'll look at at somepoint.
As for furniture images, plain laziness and the fact that for 2.5 days work, bound to miss something.
> Also - as I know you are into 'standards' how come only the images on
> the main pages have ALT tags and not all images. I guess that was for
> someone else to do, right...
That'll be lack of knowledge of getting SQL to write out the alt tags at the same time as the images. Still getting to grips with the whole SQL/ASP thing. There's laso the problem that the back end CMS doesn't contain an input field for image description yet, something I'll look at at somepoint.
As for furniture images, plain laziness and the fact that for 2.5 days work, bound to miss something.
Hmmm... wrote:
> Hmmm... I guessed it wouldn't be down to you! In fact I had a bet with
> someone and won :¬)
>
> NB. It amuses me that you say some apps like MS FP aren't able to
> create sites for non-IE browsers very well, and when someone pointed
> out that on one of your sites your navigation was bu**ered you then
> blamed non-compliant browsers!! I love it...
Which site btw?
> Hmmm... I guessed it wouldn't be down to you! In fact I had a bet with
> someone and won :¬)
>
> NB. It amuses me that you say some apps like MS FP aren't able to
> create sites for non-IE browsers very well, and when someone pointed
> out that on one of your sites your navigation was bu**ered you then
> blamed non-compliant browsers!! I love it...
Which site btw?
cookie monster wrote:
> That looks cracking, i really like the sunflower at the bottom.
The sunflower will eventually change based on season (still working that bit out) as the literature images change based on season too.
> That looks cracking, i really like the sunflower at the bottom.
The sunflower will eventually change based on season (still working that bit out) as the literature images change based on season too.
*tuts and shakes head*
Not much to say other than it looks great, very nicely done. Minimal table use looks like the result of someone who's just finished zeldmans book :) (thanks for the tip on that one, very interesting read indeed).
Though I am shocked at the use of an inline style, tut tut young Tyla.
I remember trying to get to grips with ASP, and I didn't rate it to highly.
Though I am shocked at the use of an inline style, tut tut young Tyla.
I remember trying to get to grips with ASP, and I didn't rate it to highly.
Hmmm... wrote:
> Hmmm... I guessed it wouldn't be down to you! In fact I had a bet with
> someone and won :¬)
>
> NB. It amuses me that you say some apps like MS FP aren't able to
> create sites for non-IE browsers very well, and when someone pointed
> out that on one of your sites your navigation was bu**ered you then
> blamed non-compliant browsers!! I love it...
What are you, Tyla's personal critic? Do you sit on his right shoulder dressed in a devils costume or something? You seem to be spending a lot of time trying to find flaws in his websites, I hope there isn't one of you following me around.
It's a couple of days work and it looks pretty swish, give the guy a break.
> Hmmm... I guessed it wouldn't be down to you! In fact I had a bet with
> someone and won :¬)
>
> NB. It amuses me that you say some apps like MS FP aren't able to
> create sites for non-IE browsers very well, and when someone pointed
> out that on one of your sites your navigation was bu**ered you then
> blamed non-compliant browsers!! I love it...
What are you, Tyla's personal critic? Do you sit on his right shoulder dressed in a devils costume or something? You seem to be spending a lot of time trying to find flaws in his websites, I hope there isn't one of you following me around.
It's a couple of days work and it looks pretty swish, give the guy a break.
phi11ip wrote:
>
>
> *tuts and shakes head*
*looks shocked* where?
>
>
> *tuts and shakes head*
*looks shocked* where?
cjh wrote:
> Though I am shocked at the use of an inline style, tut tut young
> Tyla.
The joys of quick fixes. (doesn't help when "Big Gay Al" is hassling you down the phone to get it up!)
May have worded that really badly!
> Though I am shocked at the use of an inline style, tut tut young
> Tyla.
The joys of quick fixes. (doesn't help when "Big Gay Al" is hassling you down the phone to get it up!)
May have worded that really badly!
Tyla wrote:
> May have worded that really badly!
There's no may about it :)
Something on the scale of that site though would have taken be weeks though, so nice job there.
> May have worded that really badly!
There's no may about it :)
Something on the scale of that site though would have taken be weeks though, so nice job there.
Miserableman wrote:
> What are you, Tyla's personal critic? Do you sit on his right
> shoulder dressed in a devils costume or something? You seem to be
> spending a lot of time trying to find flaws in his websites, I hope
> there isn't one of you following me around.
Critics are a good thing. I actually enjoy critisism. It's the only way to learn sometimes. It also sometimes takes a critic to point something obvious out that you nay have missed. Fesh pair of eye's and all that...
There's just a few things in response though...
1. The ignore button is a wonderful thing
2. Quality of work tends to be dictated to sometimes by budget/time constaraints. 2.5 days turn around with a difficult client also doesn't help.
3. CMS's don't help either. Biggest problem at the moment is the cost to build a CMS which can out put in valid code. It's expensice and difficult. It also doesn;t help being confined to M& architecture atm as this is unable to comply with basic standards such as html4.0 yet!
> What are you, Tyla's personal critic? Do you sit on his right
> shoulder dressed in a devils costume or something? You seem to be
> spending a lot of time trying to find flaws in his websites, I hope
> there isn't one of you following me around.
Critics are a good thing. I actually enjoy critisism. It's the only way to learn sometimes. It also sometimes takes a critic to point something obvious out that you nay have missed. Fesh pair of eye's and all that...
There's just a few things in response though...
1. The ignore button is a wonderful thing
2. Quality of work tends to be dictated to sometimes by budget/time constaraints. 2.5 days turn around with a difficult client also doesn't help.
3. CMS's don't help either. Biggest problem at the moment is the cost to build a CMS which can out put in valid code. It's expensice and difficult. It also doesn;t help being confined to M& architecture atm as this is unable to comply with basic standards such as html4.0 yet!
Page: