The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
What do you think of my website? [URL]http://www.oldbishopsgate.tk[/URL] You'll probably think it's really bad, but it is the first site I've ever done.
Page:
(child's voice)CSS makes things nice and tidy.
Memo's site is original. I oncce had a site that showed all the features of HTML by basically using all the tags possible. It wasn't very functional.
Memo's site is original. I oncce had a site that showed all the features of HTML by basically using all the tags possible. It wasn't very functional.
Memorandum! wrote:
> thoughts?
Amazing. So easy on the eyes, I'm loving the whole color-scheme thing.
Meanwhile.
Dark Wolf, get yourself a program that has HTML syntax highlighting (similar to notepad, if you get me, but notepad is crap) and start coding away :-)
> thoughts?
Amazing. So easy on the eyes, I'm loving the whole color-scheme thing.
Meanwhile.
Dark Wolf, get yourself a program that has HTML syntax highlighting (similar to notepad, if you get me, but notepad is crap) and start coding away :-)
My site:
[URL]http://memorandum0.tripod.com/[/URL]
thoughts?
[URL]http://memorandum0.tripod.com/[/URL]
thoughts?
CSS doth rule.
fair enough mate :)
i'm not bad at web design but obviously don't do it for a living or to a standard anywhere near yours so was unaware that frames we so loathed :)
i'll have to look into this CSS more indepth, i only really use if for text/link formatting at the moment, not entire page layouts..
i'm not bad at web design but obviously don't do it for a living or to a standard anywhere near yours so was unaware that frames we so loathed :)
i'll have to look into this CSS more indepth, i only really use if for text/link formatting at the moment, not entire page layouts..
Very_Metal wrote:
> Tyla wrote:
>
> 1. Framesets are a HUGE no no.
>
> why's that mate?
> i use frames (and iframes) fairly often and find them really easy to
> get along with, how come you don't like them?
>
> just curious...
Useless usability, nightmare for search engines, fail every aspect of accessibility, external linking into site a total mare. Generally, Frames are now frowned upon for their use especially now you can do the same with CSS yet still maintain good, readable, symantic code.
iFrames are OK, but again, you can replicate this is CSS much easier.
Genrally, the concensus throughout the industry si to "SAY NO" to frames.
I have yet to ever build a site using them!
> Tyla wrote:
>
> 1. Framesets are a HUGE no no.
>
> why's that mate?
> i use frames (and iframes) fairly often and find them really easy to
> get along with, how come you don't like them?
>
> just curious...
Useless usability, nightmare for search engines, fail every aspect of accessibility, external linking into site a total mare. Generally, Frames are now frowned upon for their use especially now you can do the same with CSS yet still maintain good, readable, symantic code.
iFrames are OK, but again, you can replicate this is CSS much easier.
Genrally, the concensus throughout the industry si to "SAY NO" to frames.
I have yet to ever build a site using them!
Tyla wrote:
> 1. Framesets are a HUGE no no.
why's that mate?
i use frames (and iframes) fairly often and find them really easy to get along with, how come you don't like them?
just curious...
> 1. Framesets are a HUGE no no.
why's that mate?
i use frames (and iframes) fairly often and find them really easy to get along with, how come you don't like them?
just curious...
LOL
Pfft. I got three before i finally got "You dah loser".
I shall win, if it kills me.
I shall win, if it kills me.
YES!
I SCORED A POINT IN PONG
I SCORED A POINT IN PONG
Page: