The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
> Its simple, if they were the "GTA 3 Trilogy" then they would
> be known as GTA 3 Vice City and GTA 3 San Andreas, which of course
> they are not. They are part of a very loose Trilogy but not part of
> this so called "GTA 3 Trilogy". How many times am I going
> to have to say this before you can actually decode the text into a
> simple enough format for your brain to understand?
the first one was called GTA3 Liberty City. Yeah,you got that good, then to carry the trilogy the called the next one, GTA Vice City, and the last one GTA San Andreas. Now from what you have said above that means that VC and SA were all the first GTA because they did not have a number, Rockstar have said that it is a trilogy.
> Ah right, my original argument returns to me. They are a Trilogy,
> albeit a very loose one but they are not the GTA 3 Trilogy.
they are the "GTA 3 Trilogy." what makes you think they are not?
> Well unless you're going to explain it then this will be the last
> post. I'm not wasting any more time on a prat who doesn't really know
> what he's talking about.
yeah apart from me proving you wrong about the GTA:3 Trilogy the post you talk about i really didnt say anything.
> Obviously it does if thats the way you interpreted it.
no i just took a wild guess. andif u really dont get it then look harded. foo'
> Oh no, it looks like I've been beaten, you're going to have to explain
> this one.
Sarcasm does not have the full affect over the net.