The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
You think the stupid argument is going to be resolved?
That either 'side' is going to get their way?
It's just rather boring, and a little sad.
> You obviously have never had an argument with Forest Fan.
Yeh, arguements with me are fun, at "Being a Christian".
Anyway, ack to science verus religion, perhaps by the time we have begun totravle back in tim maybe that is the cause of the Messiah "Jesus", lets say some renegade time traveler who decided to create a religion who called himself Jesus performed miracles that science would prove possible in the time he came from, of course people from the 1st century would believe anything they were told by someone who could do anything like what the time traveller showed them, and thus christianity was born. Well if someone could beleve in a God, then i can believe in some human creating a religion that would be proved wrong ina few more centuries time.
Millions of people have been murdered in the name of religion, yet when it all comes down to it, we eventually have to take responsibility for our own actions. Why do people who say: "i killed someone because a voice in my head told me to do it" go to jail, yet people who say "i killed millions of people because i believe in a different God to him and he told me to do it" are treated as martyrs and heroes?
Surely if there was a God, he would have made himself quite obvious by now? What if God exists only because people believe in him? If everybody accepted that there wasn't a God, would we still be murdering b*st*rds? or would we just find another excuse to kill each other?
> Deeply religious types seem to accept science when it is benefiting
> them, but as soon as it steps on the toes of their religious beliefs,
> it is suddenly shrugged off as hocum.
>
> You can't accept one school of science and disregard another, they
> are all performed using the same methods - theories that are
> confirmed through testing of those theories.
Ah, so true.
Maybe in a few years we will go back in time and find out. That'll be fun. And most likely have disastrous consquences. But they're using some ribbons (which are actually pure spectualation, based on a few facts) which are strung in the galaxy. The idea is, if you travel round them close enough and fast enough, you'll arive back where you where before you left.
Which would make Time Travel possible.
You can't accept one school of science and disregard another, they are all performed using the same methods - theories that are confirmed through testing of those theories.
Well, with science, people choose their facts after seeing the evidence.
The problem with religion is that people choose their evidence after seeing the "facts".
So you see why science is more trustworthy.
Besides, this PC is living proof that science is correct.
Religion relies PURELY on belief.
Not that it's a bad thing, but when some nutter tries to shout down science with their religion, they're asking to be laughed at.
I'm like, whatever! Talk to the hand.
You're so rejectable.
I said how can you damn a **non-believer** to hell when if they don't believe in God, they surely won't believe in Satan.