The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Which console do you think is the best?I'd say PS2!
Page:
Pc because you can upgrade it and more choices when it comes to games and cheaper aswell
The N64 was a bit of a poor console. Expensive hardware, used expensive cartriges, still needed a memory expansion and the pads were too delicate.
Also, while it was powerful for its time, the fact that the later games were bogged by slowdown show that it really couldn't cut the mustard.
But when it comes to having classic games, I don't think there'll ever be a console so good.
Also, while it was powerful for its time, the fact that the later games were bogged by slowdown show that it really couldn't cut the mustard.
But when it comes to having classic games, I don't think there'll ever be a console so good.
Lou Role wrote:
> I'd say the best console is the X-Box, from a technical point of view.
I would have to agree, but not the most popular. Ps2 has sold far more than X-box and if you were smart enough you would have bought an X-box.
> I'd say the best console is the X-Box, from a technical point of view.
I would have to agree, but not the most popular. Ps2 has sold far more than X-box and if you were smart enough you would have bought an X-box.
I'd say the best console is the X-Box, from a technical point of view.
Nintendo 64 was by far the greatest console. It had far better graphics than the ps1. Look at the statistics. Also it had far better games such as Zelda: Oot, Mario 64, Banjo Tooie, Majora's Mask, Pokémon Stadium to name afew.
Mog the cat wrote:
> five years ago I would have said playstation 1 cause it was state of
> the art when it first hit the shops most of them lie collecting dust
> in poeple's atics. It cr##ed all over the nintendo 64 with far better
> graphics and, for about 4 years it didint have any rivals and earned
> it's self a great reputation now id say playstation 2 rules
On what basis? My guess is because it's because you have one and know nothing of the other consoles.
Look at the hardware - it's inferior to Xbox in every way.
Look at the software - "quantity over quality" is sure tattood on Sony's backside.
> five years ago I would have said playstation 1 cause it was state of
> the art when it first hit the shops most of them lie collecting dust
> in poeple's atics. It cr##ed all over the nintendo 64 with far better
> graphics and, for about 4 years it didint have any rivals and earned
> it's self a great reputation now id say playstation 2 rules
On what basis? My guess is because it's because you have one and know nothing of the other consoles.
Look at the hardware - it's inferior to Xbox in every way.
Look at the software - "quantity over quality" is sure tattood on Sony's backside.
well done. :D
Ooooooo, I finally made a really long thread!Keep chating everyone! :)
Shut up shut up please.
five years ago I would have said playstation 1 cause it was state of the art when it first hit the shops most of them lie collecting dust in poeple's atics. It cr##ed all over the nintendo 64 with far better graphics and, for about 4 years it didint have any rivals and earned it's self a great reputation now id say playstation 2 rules
Page: