The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
[URL]http://www.cube-europe.com/news.php?nid=7773[/URL] - More pics added, different colour revolutions and controller ports and memory card slots for GC I'm guessing
---------------
More pics - [URL]http://media.cube.ign.com/articles/615/615030/imgs_1.html[/URL]
Fake controller - [URL]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v324/venom209/revo28vf.jpg[/URL]
Reminds me of a NES [URL]http://www.cube-europe.com/~news/revolution/revd.jpg[/URL]
Confusion - [URL]http://www.cube-europe.com/news.php?nid=7818[/URL]
Looks far better than the PS3 and 360.
> Revolution will be "two-to-three times more powerful than
> GameCube," according to Nintendo.
I'm a bit worried about this. Everyone has already got a reason not to want it. They best be lying, or have some way of the games looking really good.
It's a deliberately vague word, and I expect Microsoft and Sony are simply exagerrating, as they have done in the past with their polygon counts for the PS2 and Xbox.
Three times the power of the GameCube is ample.
What was the PS2 CPU speed - 300MHz?
35 times that is over 10GHz. It's just not going to happen.
3 x 3.2 Ghz = 9.6 Ghz
And PS3 is rumoured to be slightly stronger.
> Exactly.
>
> What was the PS2 CPU speed - 300MHz?
>
> 35 times that is over 10GHz. It's just not going to happen.
yer, speed isn't the same as power.