Viewing Thread:
"Prince Charles: Bisexual?"

I just saw the front of the one of the Sunday tabloids that raises the question about Prince Charles's sexuality. An associate of his spoke out saying that the Prince's closest aide rose the question of whether Prince Charles was indeed bisexual.

With all the recent drama over "the prince being caught in a comprimising position by a servant" it could well be that he was nailing the shoe shine boy.

Do you think there will be an uproar if it turns out that one of the Royals is gay, or is society numbed enough to accept bisexuality as a normality?

"Generalization" and "sweeping" come to mind.

Americans always claim insanity to get off the death penalty.

Dr Gonzo wrote:
> Thing is, the guy making these claims is actually insane. Medically
> confirmed as rather unstable. Past history of talking garbage to
> boot.

That's the excuse they always use. Accuse the accuser of being a crackpot, a loose cannon. He suffered/suffers from post traumatic stress disorder after his escapades in the Gulf War. That doesn't make him insane, just a little loopy, like, I would say, 75% of the population at large ;-)

Mystique wrote:
> He only wants to be a Queen like his ol' mum is all. Good for him.

Heh :-)

When you don't know someone personally, it is always best to take everything you hear and read about them with a pinch of salt. People make up stories about other people to grab the spotlight for themselves for a while. It's a sad fact of life.

I'm going to have to disagree

Suppose it is also worth ponting out that the injunction is almost totally irrelevant in the internet age. Everyone knew/knows what the story was anyway, so the injunction is irrelevant to the public's interest levels.

Mystique wrote:
> Guess that fell flat on it's ass then.

I joke.

kittworld wrote:
> Wouldn't you be if you saw Charlie and his man servant at it?
> Attacking the guy and saying he's an alcoholic was a bad way to go,
> trying to discredit him.

But the guy is actually insane. If he said you slept with frogs and ate small children you'd want to point out that he was a crack pot and talking nonsense.

> Also in other newspaper today it is said the person who went on tv to
> deny the rumours had infact a few years ago phoned the Prince's
> servant and asked if Prince Charles was bisexual, even asking several
> others if it were true.

Gathering information as is to be expected...

> I'm just going to say there's no smoke without fire

Their often is though, espically when tabloid journalism is involved.

> if they didn't
> put an injunction and then deny what we didnt even know then people
> wouldn't be so interested.

Nonsense. Any story involving accusations about a future monarch's sexual activities will receive blanket coverage, no matter what the circumstances are.

> Plus I think Diana made some comments about Charles and his
> servants in the past.

Another mentally unstable person.

Yep, a Queen.

Like Freddie Mercury.