The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I just saw the front of the one of the Sunday tabloids that raises the question about Prince Charles's sexuality. An associate of his spoke out saying that the Prince's closest aide rose the question of whether Prince Charles was indeed bisexual.
With all the recent drama over "the prince being caught in a comprimising position by a servant" it could well be that he was nailing the shoe shine boy.
Do you think there will be an uproar if it turns out that one of the Royals is gay, or is society numbed enough to accept bisexuality as a normality?
With all the recent drama over "the prince being caught in a comprimising position by a servant" it could well be that he was nailing the shoe shine boy.
Do you think there will be an uproar if it turns out that one of the Royals is gay, or is society numbed enough to accept bisexuality as a normality?
Page:
I just saw the front of the one of the Sunday tabloids that raises the question about Prince Charles's sexuality. An associate of his spoke out saying that the Prince's closest aide rose the question of whether Prince Charles was indeed bisexual.
With all the recent drama over "the prince being caught in a comprimising position by a servant" it could well be that he was nailing the shoe shine boy.
Do you think there will be an uproar if it turns out that one of the Royals is gay, or is society numbed enough to accept bisexuality as a normality?
With all the recent drama over "the prince being caught in a comprimising position by a servant" it could well be that he was nailing the shoe shine boy.
Do you think there will be an uproar if it turns out that one of the Royals is gay, or is society numbed enough to accept bisexuality as a normality?
Thing is, the guy making these claims is actually insane. Medically confirmed as rather unstable. Past history of talking garbage to boot.
Though looking at Camilla, Charlie is definetly some kind of deviant...
Just think, not that long ago we'd all be beheaded for saying such things about a future monarch. Now you just get restraining orders and huge legal fees.
Though looking at Camilla, Charlie is definetly some kind of deviant...
Just think, not that long ago we'd all be beheaded for saying such things about a future monarch. Now you just get restraining orders and huge legal fees.
Dr Gonzo wrote:
> Thing is, the guy making these claims is actually insane. Medically
> confirmed as rather unstable. Past history of talking garbage to
> boot.
Wouldn't you be if you saw Charlie and his man servant at it? Attacking the guy and saying he's an alcoholic was a bad way to go, trying to discredit him.
Also in other newspaper today it is said the person who went on tv to deny the rumours had infact a few years ago phoned the Prince's servant and asked if Prince Charles was bisexual, even asking several others if it were true.
I'm just going to say there's no smoke without fire, if they didn't put an injunction and then deny what we didnt even know then people wouldn't be so interested. Even Camilla said it was a bad idea as it just made it worse, after all this people are likely to believe it more. Plus I think Diana made some comments about Charles and his servants in the past.
> Thing is, the guy making these claims is actually insane. Medically
> confirmed as rather unstable. Past history of talking garbage to
> boot.
Wouldn't you be if you saw Charlie and his man servant at it? Attacking the guy and saying he's an alcoholic was a bad way to go, trying to discredit him.
Also in other newspaper today it is said the person who went on tv to deny the rumours had infact a few years ago phoned the Prince's servant and asked if Prince Charles was bisexual, even asking several others if it were true.
I'm just going to say there's no smoke without fire, if they didn't put an injunction and then deny what we didnt even know then people wouldn't be so interested. Even Camilla said it was a bad idea as it just made it worse, after all this people are likely to believe it more. Plus I think Diana made some comments about Charles and his servants in the past.
yes there will be an upraw and good 2, nuffink to do wit da royalss never spills
baz da ardnut wrote:
> yes there will be an upraw and good 2, nuffink to do wit da royalss
> never spills
Well that was almost a sentence. Nothing or "nuffink" personal.
> yes there will be an upraw and good 2, nuffink to do wit da royalss
> never spills
Well that was almost a sentence. Nothing or "nuffink" personal.
Yes, yes he is.
End of story.
End of story.
He only wants to be a Queen like his ol' mum is all. Good for him.
Queen?
Guess that fell flat on it's ass then.
Yep, a Queen.
Like Freddie Mercury.
Like Freddie Mercury.
Page: