The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'New Super Mario Bros'.
[URL]http://gamesradar.msn.co.uk/news/default.asp?pagetypeid=2&articleid=36322&subsectionid=1588[/URL]
Hmmmm...
Hmmmm...
Page:
gerrid wrote:
> Pandemonuim was atrocious. I thank god it isn't like that.
The sluggish gameplay maybe, but the idea of going through a 3D level with 2D gameplay would be perfect for a game like this.
Slating the 2D gameplay through 3D level idea because of how Pandemonium used it is like slating all Cel Shaded games because of Cel Damage.
Besides, I sort of liked it. :-)
> Pandemonuim was atrocious. I thank god it isn't like that.
The sluggish gameplay maybe, but the idea of going through a 3D level with 2D gameplay would be perfect for a game like this.
Slating the 2D gameplay through 3D level idea because of how Pandemonium used it is like slating all Cel Shaded games because of Cel Damage.
Besides, I sort of liked it. :-)
* 'eckers, like.
Rozza1001 wrote:
> i'll juice your face
Nice to see a little noob respecting his/her/it's elders.
And they say media teaches kids bad manners. Does it heckers.
> i'll juice your face
Nice to see a little noob respecting his/her/it's elders.
And they say media teaches kids bad manners. Does it heckers.
I'll juice your mum.
i'll juice your face
There are a few exceptions...Juiced for example.
All games look better in motion.
All side-scrollers look better in motion.
but crappy textures
having them 3D means that they can have much better animation.
Page: