The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I've got over 40 games... the thing is how much should I sell it for...
And should I sell them all together?
> Yeah but RARE aren't as great as Nintendo.
>
> Although great they are.
Yeah but Nintendo didn't make Goldeneye.
But I meant those two statements seperatly. Sorta. As in Nintendo being the people behind the N64 etc...
Rumpadodosnitzle wrote:
> Really N64 was quite crappy first party wise.
Therefore giving the examples of those games is quite understandable. Also, you say all they release are Mario and Zelda games as if it's some sort of crime. OoT, MM, and Mario 64 are widely considered as three of the best games ever made, I don't think too many Nintendo fans are bothered by the quantity considering the quality is so extraordinarily high.
> Thats why Dringo should keep his N64 you see....
Yes, he should, there were many great third party games, I agree, and the Nintendo made games are best played with the N64 controller anyway. I just found it hard to see how you could say that first party support on the N64 was poor considering the quality of some of the games.
1080 Snowboarding
Excitebike 64
F Zero X
Wave Race 64
Lylat Wars
I think you'll find there were a few Nintendo developed titles that were quality stuff.
Of course I had to ignore Paper Mario, Super Smash Brothers, Mario Kart 64, Mario 64 and the two Zelda games. But I'm sure you still get the picture.
Ofcourse, it'll never happen...
I doubt it'd be too hard for Nintendo to set up some limited service for the older games.
In fact it sounds like a jolly good idea.
Nintendo won't do it though. Unless we insist they do. Like when we told them to go online and change Zelda.
They'll probably install HD into their system because of the pointless fuss IGN are making over it.