The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3012170.stm
Page:
Goatboy wrote:
> Practical Magic wrote:
> Still avoiding the point that what you posted was wrong.
> ---
>
> Wrong how?
> By posting a link with no comment?
> Or for mocking your droning yessir?
Okay, where in your link is there any suggestion of government endorsement ? None. I was saying that the whole thing in that link is nothing new, simply further commercialisation of a technology that already exists. Furthermore the law in the UK currently prohibits it being used anyway.
I then pointed out that, for all the concern you seem to think this warrants, privacy on the internet is a far bigger issue and not addressed, but who gives a damn 'cause you're bothered about phone tracking...
Hardly groupthink.
> Practical Magic wrote:
> Still avoiding the point that what you posted was wrong.
> ---
>
> Wrong how?
> By posting a link with no comment?
> Or for mocking your droning yessir?
Okay, where in your link is there any suggestion of government endorsement ? None. I was saying that the whole thing in that link is nothing new, simply further commercialisation of a technology that already exists. Furthermore the law in the UK currently prohibits it being used anyway.
I then pointed out that, for all the concern you seem to think this warrants, privacy on the internet is a far bigger issue and not addressed, but who gives a damn 'cause you're bothered about phone tracking...
Hardly groupthink.
That would imply it was actually worth fighting over, as it is it just about deserves a few lines of typing which takes about 10 seconds :P
Practical Magic wrote:
> Still avoiding the point that what you posted was wrong.
---
Wrong how?
By posting a link with no comment?
Or for mocking your droning yessir?
> Still avoiding the point that what you posted was wrong.
---
Wrong how?
By posting a link with no comment?
Or for mocking your droning yessir?
May I suggest a bare-knuckle fight to the death.
Still avoiding the point that what you posted was wrong.
Let's see....
Zero respect from posters - check
Laughable insistance on last word - check
No stock left in what you think - check
Strenous Halofan denials removing last vestige of brain - check
Mindless repetition of "offical" line with zero input - check
Repeated taking of ball and going home only to reappear - check
Avoidance of any issues unsure about and focusing on others - check
Oh I'd say my "rants" are pretty much on the mark. Besides,it wasn't a rant, it was pointing out your groupthink mindset. Still, who am I to question you. I mean, you're the most intelligent person evah and could never ever be wrong on anything at all.
Riiiiiight?
*checks watch*
10....9....
Zero respect from posters - check
Laughable insistance on last word - check
No stock left in what you think - check
Strenous Halofan denials removing last vestige of brain - check
Mindless repetition of "offical" line with zero input - check
Repeated taking of ball and going home only to reappear - check
Avoidance of any issues unsure about and focusing on others - check
Oh I'd say my "rants" are pretty much on the mark. Besides,it wasn't a rant, it was pointing out your groupthink mindset. Still, who am I to question you. I mean, you're the most intelligent person evah and could never ever be wrong on anything at all.
Riiiiiight?
*checks watch*
10....9....
Goatboy wrote:
> What rantings? I provided a link.
This: "Blah blah goverment says good blah blah blah I agree blah blah blah please tell me what to think blah blah blah"
When if you read your own link you'd see that the laws of this government do not actually make it possible, hence your rantings about me are wrong, as usual.
> What rantings? I provided a link.
This: "Blah blah goverment says good blah blah blah I agree blah blah blah please tell me what to think blah blah blah"
When if you read your own link you'd see that the laws of this government do not actually make it possible, hence your rantings about me are wrong, as usual.
What rantings? I provided a link.
*yawns* If went back and read your own link you'd see that the government's own law currently prevents this technology being used anyway, and that it would take a change to that law to use the technology in this country.
I'm saying it's nothing to be bothered about, and your own rantings are discounted by the very link you've posted !
I'm saying it's nothing to be bothered about, and your own rantings are discounted by the very link you've posted !
Blah blah goverment says good blah blah blah I agree blah blah blah please tell me what to think blah blah blah
Page: