The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I am not necessarily agreeing with what is being said, but the point is that it needs to be voiced: should Nintendo stick to handhelds? I am a Nintendo supporter, as well as a Sony and (cringe) Microsoft supporter (but only for the Xbox. Otherwise I am a fervent Mac user). Therefore, I hope you will believe that I am not simply Nintendo-bashing. Having said that, I think quite a few will agree that the GameCube was disappointing, to say the least. However, Nintendo have struck gold with all of their handhelds, ranging from the original GameBoy to the DS.
Do you agree that Nintendo should stop hurting themselves. Unfortunately, I believe that Nintendo can't keep up in the console race, so why not turn all their attention to smashing the competition in the handheld field?
Your comments...
Do you agree that Nintendo should stop hurting themselves. Unfortunately, I believe that Nintendo can't keep up in the console race, so why not turn all their attention to smashing the competition in the handheld field?
Your comments...
Page:
Paper Mario 2, Pikmin? Why did you pick the two kiddiest games on the console.
N.B. MGS is a Sony series anyway.
N.B. MGS is a Sony series anyway.
Most of those games you mention veer away from my two favourite things about the N64.
Multiplayer & FPS action.
That's where the cube went wrong for me, but it won me back with exclusive RPGs (not that I've played them yet).
Multiplayer & FPS action.
That's where the cube went wrong for me, but it won me back with exclusive RPGs (not that I've played them yet).
Coatsy wrote:
> N.B. MGS is a Sony series anyway.
Not entirely. The Gamecube had MGS: The Twin Snakes and Metal Gear originated on Nintendo.
> N.B. MGS is a Sony series anyway.
Not entirely. The Gamecube had MGS: The Twin Snakes and Metal Gear originated on Nintendo.
Coatsy wrote:
> Paper Mario 2, Pikmin? Why did you pick the two kiddiest games on the
> console.
Because they're two of the best games?
Yet again you're jumping to very stupid conclusions. Whether intentionally or not, you've just made the point that kiddy games shouldn't be allowed to be good.
> Paper Mario 2, Pikmin? Why did you pick the two kiddiest games on the
> console.
Because they're two of the best games?
Yet again you're jumping to very stupid conclusions. Whether intentionally or not, you've just made the point that kiddy games shouldn't be allowed to be good.
and the Xbox had a remake of MGS2.
The Twin Snakes was just a remake of MGS
Coatsy wrote:
> The Twin Snakes was just a remake of MGS2
Totally irrelevant.
It appeared on a Nintendo console, so it's therefore not a Sony series at all.
> The Twin Snakes was just a remake of MGS2
Totally irrelevant.
It appeared on a Nintendo console, so it's therefore not a Sony series at all.
Nintendo should, and must always continue making consoles.
Coatsy wrote:
> Paper Mario 2, Pikmin? Why did you pick the two kiddiest games on the
> console.
>
> N.B. MGS is a Sony series anyway.
What are you on? Paper Mario 2 and Pikmin are not "kiddy" games. Pikmin is quite a challenge (it's sequel especially). And how can you not be impressed by the Revolution? It's far more exciting then the other consoles and it's going to be amazing for FPSs. I don't think you realise the potential it has.
> Paper Mario 2, Pikmin? Why did you pick the two kiddiest games on the
> console.
>
> N.B. MGS is a Sony series anyway.
What are you on? Paper Mario 2 and Pikmin are not "kiddy" games. Pikmin is quite a challenge (it's sequel especially). And how can you not be impressed by the Revolution? It's far more exciting then the other consoles and it's going to be amazing for FPSs. I don't think you realise the potential it has.
Splinter Cell > MGS
and that's multiformat.
and that's multiformat.
Page: