The "Nintendo Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
are sega first, third, or second party developers?
Page:
are sega first, third, or second party developers?
Boss Pac-Man wrote:
> are sega first, third, or second party developers?
third
> are sega first, third, or second party developers?
third
They're First patry when it comes to their own machines and the arcades (whether on their machines or the new Triforce boards) but when it comes to making games for consoles other than the Dreamcast they're third party
Edgy wrote:
> They're First patry when it comes to their own machines and the arcades (whether
> on their machines or the new Triforce boards) but when it comes to making games
> for consoles other than the Dreamcast they're third party
spot on
> They're First patry when it comes to their own machines and the arcades (whether
> on their machines or the new Triforce boards) but when it comes to making games
> for consoles other than the Dreamcast they're third party
spot on
AshMan you don't have to use quote EVERY time you write a message just to get your word count up you know!
:)
:)
Cooky wrote:
> AshMan you don't have to use quote EVERY time you write a message just to get
> your word count up you know!
:)
What are you talking about Cooky...
;-)
> AshMan you don't have to use quote EVERY time you write a message just to get
> your word count up you know!
:)
What are you talking about Cooky...
;-)
Boss Pac-Man wrote:
> are sega first, third, or second party developers?
Oh, and by the way, from the topic name 'Sega developing rank' it seems you are 'ranking' Sega... whether a company is 1st, 2nd, or 3rd party has no bearing on the quality of games they develop...
> are sega first, third, or second party developers?
Oh, and by the way, from the topic name 'Sega developing rank' it seems you are 'ranking' Sega... whether a company is 1st, 2nd, or 3rd party has no bearing on the quality of games they develop...
Sibs wrote:
> Cooky wrote:
> AshMan you don't have to use quote EVERY time you write a
> message just to get
> your word count up you know!
:)
What are you
> talking about Cooky...
;-)
Yes THIS is exactly what i'm talking about!
:}
> Cooky wrote:
> AshMan you don't have to use quote EVERY time you write a
> message just to get
> your word count up you know!
:)
What are you
> talking about Cooky...
;-)
Yes THIS is exactly what i'm talking about!
:}
Cooky wrote:
> Sibs wrote:
> Cooky wrote:
> AshMan you don't have to use quote EVERY
> time you write a
> message just to get
> your word count up you
> know!
:)
What are you
> talking about Cooky...
;-)
Yes THIS
> is exactly what i'm talking about!
:}
Whaddaya mean... :D
> Sibs wrote:
> Cooky wrote:
> AshMan you don't have to use quote EVERY
> time you write a
> message just to get
> your word count up you
> know!
:)
What are you
> talking about Cooky...
;-)
Yes THIS
> is exactly what i'm talking about!
:}
Whaddaya mean... :D
Sibs wrote:
> Cooky wrote:
> Sibs wrote:
> Cooky wrote:
> AshMan you don't have to
> use quote EVERY
> time you write a
> message just to get
> your word
> count up you
> know!
:)
What are you
> talking about
> Cooky...
;-)
Yes THIS
> is exactly what i'm talking
> about!
:}
> Whaddaya mean... :D
Can't really remember anymore!
;)
> Cooky wrote:
> Sibs wrote:
> Cooky wrote:
> AshMan you don't have to
> use quote EVERY
> time you write a
> message just to get
> your word
> count up you
> know!
:)
What are you
> talking about
> Cooky...
;-)
Yes THIS
> is exactly what i'm talking
> about!
:}
> Whaddaya mean... :D
Can't really remember anymore!
;)
Page: