The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
In a move that could see new laws passed against gay and lesbian couples, one lesbian couple from Australia are attempting to sue their doctor after one of them fell pregnant with twin girls after paying for IVF. The reason for the anger is that they asked the doctor for only one child and they believe that their rights include the hospital paying for private schooling and general fees involved in bringing up the second child.
This will almost certainly cause a reaction within the legal system as to the rights of same sex couples to not only choose their children but even having rights to medical treatment such as IVF.
In my opinion, this couple are being completely unreasonable in expecting payment because they had 2 children instead of one, surely the fact that they had children in the first place when others could not is enough? Other people who have children naturally don't get to make such choices.
What does everyone else think?
This will almost certainly cause a reaction within the legal system as to the rights of same sex couples to not only choose their children but even having rights to medical treatment such as IVF.
In my opinion, this couple are being completely unreasonable in expecting payment because they had 2 children instead of one, surely the fact that they had children in the first place when others could not is enough? Other people who have children naturally don't get to make such choices.
What does everyone else think?
Page:
Feel free to be as 'caustic' as you like!*
*within boundries of this forum, obviously!
*within boundries of this forum, obviously!
oh dear,
edit: ..oh dear is the only response i can muster without writing anything really caustic
and that is caustic in terms of definition 1 from dictionary.con
1. capable of burning, corroding, or destroying living tissue.
2. severely critical or sarcastic: a caustic remark.
edit: ..oh dear is the only response i can muster without writing anything really caustic
and that is caustic in terms of definition 1 from dictionary.con
1. capable of burning, corroding, or destroying living tissue.
2. severely critical or sarcastic: a caustic remark.
In a move that could see new laws passed against gay and lesbian couples, one lesbian couple from Australia are attempting to sue their doctor after one of them fell pregnant with twin girls after paying for IVF. The reason for the anger is that they asked the doctor for only one child and they believe that their rights include the hospital paying for private schooling and general fees involved in bringing up the second child.
This will almost certainly cause a reaction within the legal system as to the rights of same sex couples to not only choose their children but even having rights to medical treatment such as IVF.
In my opinion, this couple are being completely unreasonable in expecting payment because they had 2 children instead of one, surely the fact that they had children in the first place when others could not is enough? Other people who have children naturally don't get to make such choices.
What does everyone else think?
This will almost certainly cause a reaction within the legal system as to the rights of same sex couples to not only choose their children but even having rights to medical treatment such as IVF.
In my opinion, this couple are being completely unreasonable in expecting payment because they had 2 children instead of one, surely the fact that they had children in the first place when others could not is enough? Other people who have children naturally don't get to make such choices.
What does everyone else think?
Page: