The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Can we at least take this into consideration?
> Ninja_Reborn wrote:
> I don't think we have enough admins active here. Or even people
> who have the authority to ban.
>
> We need to find out who chooses these people to win, I just
> don't get it...
>
>
> I've inquired who awards GAD, because some post that have been
> awarded are simply ridiculous. I think Vexxxed came forward. I
> wonder where he is now..
>
> It's like the Freeola admin are pressured to award GAD daily and
> just award based on posts that appear long and drawn-out as some
> indicator that the content is quality and genuine work.
>
> I believe the former SR used to ban individuals for plagerism.
> I say we continue that rule, because obviously people like Dan
> just don't get it. The fact that Freeola keeps awarding him
> makes them look like sheer idiots time and again.
No, they are not forced. They just can be asked. So they just don't care and award to anyone.
> No, they are not forced. They just can be asked. So they just
> don't care and award to anyone.
You know this? Who is "they" then?? By golly, I think you will have answered your own inquiry. :)
As far as I'm concerned, this situation has come to a conclusion. Hopefully someone at Freeola will award the GAD to someone else, perhaps even the original creator of the review.
...
...
...
No sorry, I cant do it. I get points for trying though, right? :P
I think the point's been made, we don't like plagiarism (what an odd word, a z instead of an s in every instance but that...)
Anyway, who cares? If anyone 'ought to be angry, it's the original source of the writing.
> Grow up Garin. You're one of the fist to make a big fuss about
> something like this. Try and be a little more mature and keep
> your stupid "drama queen" comments to yourself. It
> serves no purpose but to annoy others.
>
> As far as I'm concerned, this situation has come to a
> conclusion. Hopefully someone at Freeola will award the GAD to
> someone else, perhaps even the original creator of the review.
I agree, he was always the first and last to moan when I won them.
Chaos I think the people get annoyed because they spend an hour writing a review and some one wins the GAD for a C&P from IGN.
Just to let you guys know even when it is highlighted to the freeola staff they still send out the GADS. Both the GADs I won for supposidly plagerised reviews I recieved.
This is inspite of me sending an email and a post saying they should cancel it because of the hassel i was getting from the forums. Dont hold your breath they resind his.
I recon the tactic is to stop posting reviews until they actually read them to decide on their legitimacy.
> Both the GADs I won for supposidly plagerised reviews I recieved.
They weren't 'supposedly' copied, they were copied, full stop.