The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Hi Its Lulu and I'd like to give some important news...
DONT WASTE ON A DSi XL IF YOU HAVE A DSi!
plus there is going to be a NEW DS NEXT YEAR!!!!!!
it lets you play your games in 3D!! I dont know if you have to buy special games... but it is exactly like dsi xl but in 3d so dont buy it if you already have dsi xl already, this is just a warning so you dont end up buying dsi xl and then not wanting it in the next 2 weeks,
oh yeah btw its coming out on MARCH 2011!!! its a while but its worth the wait!
Adios!
-Lulu =3
DONT WASTE ON A DSi XL IF YOU HAVE A DSi!
plus there is going to be a NEW DS NEXT YEAR!!!!!!
it lets you play your games in 3D!! I dont know if you have to buy special games... but it is exactly like dsi xl but in 3d so dont buy it if you already have dsi xl already, this is just a warning so you dont end up buying dsi xl and then not wanting it in the next 2 weeks,
oh yeah btw its coming out on MARCH 2011!!! its a while but its worth the wait!
Adios!
-Lulu =3
Page:
dav2612 wrote:
> You won't need the glasses.
should be interesting then.
> You won't need the glasses.
should be interesting then.
spoonbeast wrote:
> dav2612 wrote:
> You won't need the glasses.
>
> should be interesting then.
If it's anything like the display TV they had in Harrod's the other week (yeah that's right, I'm a name-dropping mo-fo) then everybody is going to get eye strain. I sat there for a couple of minutes and ended up with a headache. The best thing I can compare it to is a 'magic eye' picture which you are only able to see if you look at a certain point "past" the picture.
Weird? Yes.
Necessary? Not at all.
> dav2612 wrote:
> You won't need the glasses.
>
> should be interesting then.
If it's anything like the display TV they had in Harrod's the other week (yeah that's right, I'm a name-dropping mo-fo) then everybody is going to get eye strain. I sat there for a couple of minutes and ended up with a headache. The best thing I can compare it to is a 'magic eye' picture which you are only able to see if you look at a certain point "past" the picture.
Weird? Yes.
Necessary? Not at all.
Butch wrote:
> spoonbeast wrote:
> dav2612 wrote:
> You won't need the glasses.
>
> should be interesting then.
>
> If it's anything like the display TV they had in Harrod's the
> other week (yeah that's right, I'm a name-dropping mo-fo) then
> everybody is going to get eye strain. I sat there for a couple of
> minutes and ended up with a headache.
The statue of Mohammed Al-Fayed gave me eye-strain.
> spoonbeast wrote:
> dav2612 wrote:
> You won't need the glasses.
>
> should be interesting then.
>
> If it's anything like the display TV they had in Harrod's the
> other week (yeah that's right, I'm a name-dropping mo-fo) then
> everybody is going to get eye strain. I sat there for a couple of
> minutes and ended up with a headache.
The statue of Mohammed Al-Fayed gave me eye-strain.
Nintendo aren't incompetent, they won't release a product that causes major headaches again. Remember the Virtual Boy? So do they.
Yeah, but nintendo are promising 3d and unless they are pulling something absolutely revolutionary its not going to convince me they succeeded. Hell, they haven't convinced me that the dual touch screen idea was necessary for gaming. Yeah i get a hud and all that but most games i buy now don't bother with it. Like castlevania, its pointless and fidelly to implement.
A DSI XL 3D that is so crazy its tecnically the best ds yet and im starting to save up for it
Page: