The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'Final Fantasy XII'.
Im very surprised that nobody else has done this already. New screen shots and what have ya all availble from this site. [URL] http://media.ps2.ign.com/media/488/488222/imgs_1.html [/URL]
very nice indeed. looking forward to it. as there is very little in the way of good new stuff for the PS2.
enjoy
very nice indeed. looking forward to it. as there is very little in the way of good new stuff for the PS2.
enjoy
Page:
That's one of the reasons why I like Final fantasy. It is unique. If I wanted normal battles then I would play Zelda or something but if they change FF to normal battles then all will be lost.
Unless you can think of a way of controlling 3+ different characters in one real time battle, I think you can safely assume it's still menu based fighting, whether it's real time or not.
Tales of Phantasia did it on the Snes, Star Ocean has done it, the .Hack series has done it. The computer just controls the other two and you have the option of switching between characters.
Keep the battle gauges anyway, nothing more exciting then knocking the mega boss down to his last bit of health and praying that your bar fills up quick enough to finish him off. Failing that just go to a strategy type battle system.
Either way NO LIVE ACTION BATTLES ........ please
Either way NO LIVE ACTION BATTLES ........ please
No vampyr, I doubt it will go past 12 because all of the final fantasy's were out on the omega and those only went up to 12, but then they might make a few more because 10-2 wasn't on it.
Leave FF alone.
Sure it's a sell out. But it's innovative!
Oh wait, no it's not.
Why do we like it again???
Sure it's a sell out. But it's innovative!
Oh wait, no it's not.
Why do we like it again???
Well they've got the names for up to 15 i think i remember reading in a games rag ages ago so there's at least 3 more coming after twelve
Back to the battle system for sec, yup i'd like it to stay the same as all the previous installments, but they may go for a KOTOR style RPG that's normal fighting 'turnish' based gameplay where you still can control all your characters/or let the computer do it, and it ain't that bad.
ßulle†† wrote:
> Or maybe it's because we still need FFXI first.
>
> Sony/Square Enix suck balls at things like this. By the time Europe
> get FFXI, the rest of the world will have FFXV the way things are
> going.
We may have got FFX later, but by the time we got it, it was much bigger than the JAP version.
> Or maybe it's because we still need FFXI first.
>
> Sony/Square Enix suck balls at things like this. By the time Europe
> get FFXI, the rest of the world will have FFXV the way things are
> going.
We may have got FFX later, but by the time we got it, it was much bigger than the JAP version.
I dunno about you lot and it would be a challlenge for square-enix but I think that they should make ff8-2 like they did with ffx-2 even though ffx-2 rubbish I still reckon that they can make ff8-2 have a beeter story line and gameplay system than it.
Page: