The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'Medal Of Honour: Pacific Assault'.
Downloading from Filefront as I speak...
Page:
Mode wrote:
> Do you keep the same character throughout?
Different character for each campaign, though you'll not notice. Neither has their own voice, and you'll doubtfully remember their name.
> Do you keep the same character throughout?
Different character for each campaign, though you'll not notice. Neither has their own voice, and you'll doubtfully remember their name.
cipro wrote:
> Mode wrote:
> Im still yet to complete CoD. I guess you get different endings for
> the different campaigns. Is there any way to choose what campaign
> you do?
>
> You can't change which order you play in, you can't even skip that
> bloody simple and boring training mission, and as far as ending go,
> each campaign just ends abruptly, transferring you to the next. The
> game ending comes after the Russian campaign.
Do you keep the same character throughout?
> Mode wrote:
> Im still yet to complete CoD. I guess you get different endings for
> the different campaigns. Is there any way to choose what campaign
> you do?
>
> You can't change which order you play in, you can't even skip that
> bloody simple and boring training mission, and as far as ending go,
> each campaign just ends abruptly, transferring you to the next. The
> game ending comes after the Russian campaign.
Do you keep the same character throughout?
All EA care about is money now. When they have not made a game for a while they release:
The Sims: Casino
The Sims: Mcdonalds
The Sims: XXX
The Sim.......
And the occasional football game.
The Sims: Casino
The Sims: Mcdonalds
The Sims: XXX
The Sim.......
And the occasional football game.
Mode wrote:
> Im still yet to complete CoD. I guess you get different endings for
> the different campaigns. Is there any way to choose what campaign
> you do?
You can't change which order you play in, you can't even skip that bloody simple and boring training mission, and as far as ending go, each campaign just ends abruptly, transferring you to the next. The game ending comes after the Russian campaign.
> Im still yet to complete CoD. I guess you get different endings for
> the different campaigns. Is there any way to choose what campaign
> you do?
You can't change which order you play in, you can't even skip that bloody simple and boring training mission, and as far as ending go, each campaign just ends abruptly, transferring you to the next. The game ending comes after the Russian campaign.
Reefer wrote:
> I never said it was a MoH game. Read my post again. And the ending
> was cack, in my opinion. Red Faction, for example, is an FPS with an
> ending 10x better.
It was the way you said it...
> I never said it was a MoH game. Read my post again. And the ending
> was cack, in my opinion. Red Faction, for example, is an FPS with an
> ending 10x better.
It was the way you said it...
Mode wrote:
> MoH: RS sucked, I guess MoH: PA is just the same but with a few bells
> added on and a few new maps?
RS and PA where developed by different teams, I expect PA to be better than it's console counterpart, but will probably still pale to the likes of CoD and Brothers in Arms. Having played many of the MOH games though, I can say that this, as all MOH that have come before it, play almost exactly the same. Not one for change EA.
> What was Allied Assault like?
Good, but dated now. 2015 really did a grand job, but they where hampered by EA sticking their noses in and forcing the developers to release the game early, and put in an online multiplayer mode that wasn't originally planned. The results where a good first half, but average second.
> MoH: RS sucked, I guess MoH: PA is just the same but with a few bells
> added on and a few new maps?
RS and PA where developed by different teams, I expect PA to be better than it's console counterpart, but will probably still pale to the likes of CoD and Brothers in Arms. Having played many of the MOH games though, I can say that this, as all MOH that have come before it, play almost exactly the same. Not one for change EA.
> What was Allied Assault like?
Good, but dated now. 2015 really did a grand job, but they where hampered by EA sticking their noses in and forcing the developers to release the game early, and put in an online multiplayer mode that wasn't originally planned. The results where a good first half, but average second.
Im still yet to complete CoD. I guess you get different endings for the different campaigns. Is there any way to choose what campaign you do?
[lol]
Reefer wrote:
> I never said it was a MoH game. Read my post again. And the ending
> was cack, in my opinion. Red Faction, for example, is an FPS with an
> ending 10x better.
Red Faction had one of the most unremarkable endings ever, so much so that I can't remember what exactly it ended like, though I'm quite sure it involved the two main characters sitting down after a hard days killing while soldiers buzzed overhead in ships. Dull.
CoD's ending actually gave the game closure, far better than many games I've played. It instilled the feeling that you actually achieved something, and the file footage of the real conflict was integrated well. It was much better than Allied Assaults ending anyway: "Wow, look, a fort blowing up" Screen fades....
> I never said it was a MoH game. Read my post again. And the ending
> was cack, in my opinion. Red Faction, for example, is an FPS with an
> ending 10x better.
Red Faction had one of the most unremarkable endings ever, so much so that I can't remember what exactly it ended like, though I'm quite sure it involved the two main characters sitting down after a hard days killing while soldiers buzzed overhead in ships. Dull.
CoD's ending actually gave the game closure, far better than many games I've played. It instilled the feeling that you actually achieved something, and the file footage of the real conflict was integrated well. It was much better than Allied Assaults ending anyway: "Wow, look, a fort blowing up" Screen fades....
Mode wrote:
> Reefer wrote:
> Mode wrote:
> Reefer wrote:
> Azul wrote:
> CoD isn't a MOH game.
>
> And what are you on about?
>
> It's probably one of the best endings to an FPS ever.
>
> I never said it was a MoH game. Read my post again. And the ending
> was cack, in my opinion. Red Faction, for example, is an FPS with an
> ending 10x better.
>
> Red Faction ending was crap. Although i dont remember, could you
> refresh my memory.
>
> It was the whole thing with defusing the bomb. I loved it.
>
> Yes that was good, shame the second game did not live up to its
> standard.
> Red-Faction could have been made into a franchise but instead it was
> crap.
Heh, I never bought Red Faction 2. A lot of people said it was bad, but I just never bothered. I'll probably pick it up second hand for £10 some time.
> Reefer wrote:
> Mode wrote:
> Reefer wrote:
> Azul wrote:
> CoD isn't a MOH game.
>
> And what are you on about?
>
> It's probably one of the best endings to an FPS ever.
>
> I never said it was a MoH game. Read my post again. And the ending
> was cack, in my opinion. Red Faction, for example, is an FPS with an
> ending 10x better.
>
> Red Faction ending was crap. Although i dont remember, could you
> refresh my memory.
>
> It was the whole thing with defusing the bomb. I loved it.
>
> Yes that was good, shame the second game did not live up to its
> standard.
> Red-Faction could have been made into a franchise but instead it was
> crap.
Heh, I never bought Red Faction 2. A lot of people said it was bad, but I just never bothered. I'll probably pick it up second hand for £10 some time.
Page: