The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I started this in another forum but i don't think many people read it, it was part of another topic.
What the main idea of it was, if and when on-line gamming does become part of our console playing lives then maybee the developers and sony should get together and allow the users (who pay a small signing on fee) to connect to a site where they can download demos of up and comming games. This would allow them to get good positive feedback from gameplayers who know what they want. Think no more games that are really cr@p, and would allow us a sneek preview of what we will be playing later that year. I think this would be a good idea as gammers would get a little say into what they would like a game to be like, and developers would make more money as it would sell more as it is what the gammers want.
Let me know what your views on this are please.
What the main idea of it was, if and when on-line gamming does become part of our console playing lives then maybee the developers and sony should get together and allow the users (who pay a small signing on fee) to connect to a site where they can download demos of up and comming games. This would allow them to get good positive feedback from gameplayers who know what they want. Think no more games that are really cr@p, and would allow us a sneek preview of what we will be playing later that year. I think this would be a good idea as gammers would get a little say into what they would like a game to be like, and developers would make more money as it would sell more as it is what the gammers want.
Let me know what your views on this are please.
Page:
I cannot believe I just read satrical posts by the staff of SR, the Forums are becomming better places. As long as they aren't secretly smoking pot!!!
Yeah you might have to pay fees for being on-line but if on-line gamming gets the go-ahead then you would have to pay it anyway. This would just be a choice for thoose who are interested in it. Not everyone has to do it. Who knows maybee sony and the others could cut a deal with some ISP's to get us cheap charges for playing on-line.
Quazimodo wrote:
> WEll yeah but it is being 2 faced in a mild way.
I thought it made a good point in quite an amusing and sarcastic way, and could be read either as a snipe at the author of the thread or a pop at the posters who descended on it (him).
> WEll yeah but it is being 2 faced in a mild way.
I thought it made a good point in quite an amusing and sarcastic way, and could be read either as a snipe at the author of the thread or a pop at the posters who descended on it (him).
Well!!???????? What's wrong with pointing out mistakes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Tony wrote:
> Quazimodo wrote:
> Should you be saying stuff like that.
I
> had trouble saying it, so I wrote it down.
WEll yeah but it is being 2 faced in a mild way.
> Quazimodo wrote:
> Should you be saying stuff like that.
I
> had trouble saying it, so I wrote it down.
WEll yeah but it is being 2 faced in a mild way.
Mr.Snuggly wrote:
> What?
Now that you have my previously-exclusive staff regular colour, I expect sentences of at least three words, including some words with more than one syllable.
> What?
Now that you have my previously-exclusive staff regular colour, I expect sentences of at least three words, including some words with more than one syllable.
I'm taking the Sniper approach to posting:
At least my oranges aren't growing beards.
At least my oranges aren't growing beards.
Quazimodo wrote:
> Should you be saying stuff like that.
I had trouble saying it, so I wrote it down.
> Should you be saying stuff like that.
I had trouble saying it, so I wrote it down.
Answering the post by ali.
Anyway if you were to pay a small fee what about the phone bills?
Page: