The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Warner and Universal are expected to follow suit.
[URL]http://www.blu-ray.com[/URL]
There's also an article there reporting that almost every major PC player is supporting Blu-Ray over HD-DVD.
Could HD-DVD be dead before it's even launched? According to the report on VideoBusiness.com...
"Several execs in each camp believe the Paramount announcement to publish in both formats - which is the direction Warner has been leaning for the past week or two with a similar announcement expected this week - is simply a temporary face-saving strategy and that ultimately all studios will shift completely over to Blu-ray by launch time."
Apparently even Microsoft won't commit to using HD-DVD in future Xbox 360's.
It's a long article, but well worth a read if you've any interest in the subject.
> Blu-Ray is better because it has a cooler name. You all know it's the
> truth, let's not pretend it has anything to do with anything else.
I hadn't thought of that, but now that you mention it...
;-p
It also seems Wookie is much more in touch with what each of the companies behind Blu-ray are saying, so I'd be happy to accept that Blu-ray is going to be the format most distributers in America at least will use.
Plus, if the consumer is going to be buying a PS3 then that's the format they'll use and Microsoft cannot show their hand with the 360 until Sony show theirs because right now sony are the industry leaders and trend setters and if the PS3 starts outselling the 360 at 2:1 then having HD-DVD instead of Blu-ray will take the bottom right out of the market for the 360 as a digital media hub for the living room and leave it's only trump card being Media Centre streaming.
I can see this being a more important battle between the consoles than processor power and graphics capabilities as it's one of the main things which has a direct effect on the end consumer.
> Which is linked to from blu-ray.com who must choose their links with
> an immense amount of impartiality.
Okay, try this one: [URL]http://www.tomshardware.com/hardnews/20051003_131537.html[/URL]
> I wouldn't expect such a postive spin from blu-ray.com...
The report isn't actually on Blu-Ray.com - it's on VideoBusiness.com