Viewing Thread:
"Who still plays WoW?"

I'm thinking of subscribing for a month maybe.
Anything new since about March/April? I bet there are about 3 updates too.

I'll start a new topic for it, see if we can get some more people interested, yar?

Yeah cool, I'm up for that, but my Priest is eating all my WoW time.

It's just so cool to be so powerful

>:)

Yeh, do a new topic.

phi11ip wrote:
> Hedfix wrote:
> That sort of intricate menu system's already been translated well
> onto
> the Xbox with Fable's approach.
>
> That wouldn't work.
>
> [URL]http://www.phi11ip.com/wow/raid12.jpg[/URL]
>
> I could have a lot more buttons on that screen, but I'd confuse
> myself. When in battle you're using about 5-10 different ones. Moving
> a cursor over them will take aaaages.

Cursor? I'm talking about Fable on the Xbox. It's all "hold down this button for this menu then make a quick selection". This works well even though Fable's in realtime (isn't WoW slightly turnbased? - you get time to select a move before the fight continues right? - anyway, I forget).

WoW isn't exactly turn-based, but the next move is decided on your attack speed. Someone with a 2.5 speed weapon will get in more hits than someone with a 3.5 speed weapon - not necessarily a bad thing, since slower ones often do more damage.

Move/turn, pretty much the same thing. That's the sort of thing I thought it did.

Bullett wrote:
> WoW isn't exactly turn-based, but the next move is decided on your
> attack speed.

So it's realtime then. :D

Yeah, after reading it back, I realised I took the long way round :D

It's completely real time, in PvP you almost need a trigger finger.

Cycloon wrote:
> It's completely real time, in PvP you almost need a trigger finger.

Plus, the differing levels of spells add more choice.Do you heal at lvl 6 what takes 200+ mana, or just at the lvl 3 than they need, for far less.

I've never seen such an icon heavy game.