The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Can Henman really win this year?
Page:
That match was brilliant.
1. Because Venus played an excellent game
2. Sharapova is hot
1. Because Venus played an excellent game
2. Sharapova is hot
Same thing
Wasn't expecting that result. A Williams sister in the Wimbledon final for six years running now.
That was Serena.
Didn't Sharapova steamroll Venus in the final last year?
Venus just made a mess of the world's easiest shot on match point.
M. Sharapova vs. V. Williams
Fantastic match so far, possibly the best of the tournament, men or women.
Fantastic match so far, possibly the best of the tournament, men or women.
JFH wrote:
> I can't see Murray going too much
> further and his next game seems winable, and if I'm not mistaken he
> would have played Nadal in either the fourth round or the
> quarter-finals so he may have been let off a bit there.
I think he'll be out in the next round - Nalbandian is a very tough opponent. If he does make it through though, it wouldn't surprise me if he also won the match after that, but then he'd face the really big guns. He does appear to have the easiest quarter at the moment though, so its a good chance for him. (Having said that, Mirnyi is excellent and Thomas Johansson beat Murray a few weeks back [at Queens]).
As for Nadal, I think he would have been beaten by Murray had the match come together. As mentioned earlier in this topic, he was never going to make it far.
> I can't see Murray going too much
> further and his next game seems winable, and if I'm not mistaken he
> would have played Nadal in either the fourth round or the
> quarter-finals so he may have been let off a bit there.
I think he'll be out in the next round - Nalbandian is a very tough opponent. If he does make it through though, it wouldn't surprise me if he also won the match after that, but then he'd face the really big guns. He does appear to have the easiest quarter at the moment though, so its a good chance for him. (Having said that, Mirnyi is excellent and Thomas Johansson beat Murray a few weeks back [at Queens]).
As for Nadal, I think he would have been beaten by Murray had the match come together. As mentioned earlier in this topic, he was never going to make it far.
Pro Evo wrote:
> Hell, for the money he makes, id go out there every year, do average
> and pick up the pay cheques.
I read somewhere that Henman is the richest player who has never won a Grand Slam. At least he's succeeded in making history, though perhaps not quite how he planned.
> Hell, for the money he makes, id go out there every year, do average
> and pick up the pay cheques.
I read somewhere that Henman is the richest player who has never won a Grand Slam. At least he's succeeded in making history, though perhaps not quite how he planned.
I don't think he tries to make himself more tired...
He's just not developed the upper body muscle to put shots away yet. Unlike freaky Nadal, who really does look like he's used steroids before, Murray is rather gangly and thin.
I was wondering - is it legal to take steroids if you're not competing?
He's just not developed the upper body muscle to put shots away yet. Unlike freaky Nadal, who really does look like he's used steroids before, Murray is rather gangly and thin.
I was wondering - is it legal to take steroids if you're not competing?
Page: