The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I hate you guys.
It's a cold, lonely place we live in. The only people who deserve my empathy are those close to me, or those that have a fat wallet come last orders.
I was thinking one was an underwater tea party for sad clowns who've all been touched emotionally by the decline of lawn croquet and the other a international celebration of the sport of prodding great apes with reams of fine crimson silk.
> the other is the
> opperative section of a tricky constitutional issue for the UK.
--
C'mon, there's going to be huge public apathy to the wedding. It's not a consitutional issue at all. She'll be Princess Consort, and most of the country wouldn't care less if she was called Queen.
All they're there for is to attract tourism. Any talk about the Queen being a constitutional safeguard is rubbish, really.
> I don't see why they moved the royal wedding back either. Why not get
> 2 utterly pointless, meaningless and pitiful nonevents out the way in
> one day?
If you can't see how they'll be major events for very different reasons, you're an idiot. One celebrates the passing of a man who spiritually lead hundereds of millions of people; the other is the opperative section of a tricky constitutional issue for the UK.
That may mean nothing to you, but it doesn't make it a "nonevent". Unless you're hugely self-centred and ignorant, of course.
Something along these lines:
"He shouted a firm 'no' to contraception, homosexuality, abortion, and female priests - but it was a dedicated 'yes' to human rights."
I mean, wtf!1?
I left the room after that.
What a load of balls.
I don't see why they moved the royal wedding back either. Why not get 2 utterly pointless, meaningless and pitiful nonevents out the way in one day?
> Stryke wrote:
> What did John Paul do exactly, against Communism?
>
> Was that in reply to me? He didn't do a lot... which seemed quite
> obvious from my post...
--
No, I was agreeing with you, far less eloquently.
> I can see the headlines now...
>
> "The Pope is turned on by Paradox"
You know he is. Especially when I wear my nipple tassles.
> What did John Paul do exactly, against Communism?
Was that in reply to me? He didn't do a lot... which seemed quite obvious from my post...