Viewing Thread:
"The world's strongest boy"

Channel 5 at the moment. It's quite scary.

You could cut the sexual tension between you two with a knife. Go get your own thread.

Tanoy wrote:
> munn wrote:
> You're assuming I didn't get it and was being sarcastic to it, but,
> alas, I did get it, and I was congratulating him on such a fine
> piece
> of work.
>
> The point is, it wasn't a fine piece of work!! It was a simple
> statement as he later himself acknowledged, but you acted like he'd
> done something really clever which was how we knew you were faking
> it! Moron.

I think you should shut your mouth now.

munn wrote:
> You're assuming I didn't get it and was being sarcastic to it, but,
> alas, I did get it, and I was congratulating him on such a fine piece
> of work.

The point is, it wasn't a fine piece of work!! It was a simple statement as he later himself acknowledged, but you acted like he'd done something really clever which was how we knew you were faking it! Moron.

You're assuming I didn't get it and was being sarcastic to it, but, alas, I did get it, and I was congratulating him on such a fine piece of work.

munn wrote:

>
> I wasn't being sarcastic.


Aahahah, you haven't got the slightest clue, have you?

Tanoy wrote:
> You're who with the what now?

What? You scare me more by the minute.

Tanoy wrote:
> munn wrote:
> English_Bloke wrote:
> Tanoy wrote:
> Was that a pointed comment directed at me?
>
> If so, I'm shocked and appalled.
>
> Nothing gets past you, does it?
>
> Except this.
>
> *Does something*
>
> Get it?
>
> Fantastic. Encore.
>
>
> Hhaha, Munn didn't get it. Not that there was much to get, btw.

I wasn't being sarcastic.

Apple Crumble wrote: some pap.

You're who with the what now?

Tanoy wrote:
> Not that there was much to get, btw.

What? It was deep, man.

Tanoy, my evil arch-nemesis, why don't you leave?