The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I personally am subscribing to NGC, and I occasionally get Official Nintendo magazine, but have never sampled Cube or G-Force.
I am also an Edge reader.
What are your opinions?
> Don't get me started on the Datel funded G-FORCE. Practically every
> page has adverts for Datel products. They know nothing about games,
> have little/no experience and are too expensive.
I know what you meen, i got the sms issue, for the dvd, they onl;y gave it 71%, even starfox got higher.
I took great joy i riping out that issues pages and shredding them.
They now line my hamster's cage.
NGC is the best, i get NOM for official news, and get cube because i like their features and news coverage (like the six pages they spent saying how gamecube wasn't kiddy)
I then get CVG and GM, because all my friends have playstation 2's, and they all hate gamecube ,morons (they don't come on here, so i can say that), i just get the mags so i can read the ps2 news and have something to talk to them about.
Only ever got 1 issue of Edge, the one with super mario sunshine in, i just wanted to read their reveiw of it.
Quite a good mag actually, althougfh may be a little grown up for some people.
(I remember they had an article about how piracy affects the market, etc.)
NOM is rubbish. Its reviews are boring, it has become pompous and blind to the fact that Nintendo needs to put more effort into it's marketing and genaral running of the company in Europe. It also has too many adverts.
Don't get me started on the Datel funded G-FORCE. Practically every page has adverts for Datel products. They know nothing about games, have little/no experience and are too expensive.
As for Edge and GamesTM, I read them in the shop, much cheaper.
"I love 4 player gaming it's great"
was deep and meaningful, showing how popular multiplayer had becoe, and how important it was.
How we all laughed.
>
> Pictures are good, and accompany the writing well.
ha ha
> Actually I'm betting you can't read, I don't blame you for preffering
> NOM over NGC, there's so many pretty pictures.
Pictures are good, and accompany the writing well.
> Maverick42 wrote:
> I think NOM's the best GCN magazine,
>
> Do you close your eyes when you read it, or do they pay you to say
> this?
>
> Actually I'm betting you can't read, I don't blame you for preffering
> NOM over NGC, there's so many pretty pictures.
I agree with Maverick42 NOM's is much better
1. more infomation
2. less adverts
NGC all the way :P
> I think NOM's the best GCN magazine,
Do you close your eyes when you read it, or do they pay you to say this?
Actually I'm betting you can't read, I don't blame you for preffering NOM over NGC, there's so many pretty pictures.