The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'Animal Crossing'.
I've recently become addicted to Animal Crossing.
I had to go round everyone in my town of Nintendo to get a hankerchief which they had all let each other borrow.
YUCK!!!
This games rocks :D
I'll probably end up getting the UK version at Players Choice price - providing it does go down in price.
I had to go round everyone in my town of Nintendo to get a hankerchief which they had all let each other borrow.
YUCK!!!
This games rocks :D
I'll probably end up getting the UK version at Players Choice price - providing it does go down in price.
Page:
Dringo wrote:
> Legends is not a new game because it features a smoother frame rate
> and a new character.
>
> Animal Crossing is not a new game because it has a few updates.
It may not be a completely different title, but I'm sorry I refuse to classify it as just a port. It's not.
And you know as well as I do Legends had a lot more differences than that.
> Legends is not a new game because it features a smoother frame rate
> and a new character.
>
> Animal Crossing is not a new game because it has a few updates.
It may not be a completely different title, but I'm sorry I refuse to classify it as just a port. It's not.
And you know as well as I do Legends had a lot more differences than that.
Well it's like Code Veronica X on the PS2... an extra room, slightly improved graphics and a few extra cut scenes do not make it a new game.
Legends is not a new game because it features a smoother frame rate and a new character.
Animal Crossing is not a new game because it has a few updates.
Legends is not a new game because it features a smoother frame rate and a new character.
Animal Crossing is not a new game because it has a few updates.
Dringo wrote:
> But they are not, they had the same structure, the SAME DAMN GAME!
>
> Would you call Tony Hawks 2X on the X-box a different game to Tony
> Hawks 2?
So what if two games have the same structure? EA sports game usually have the more or less the same structure year after year. They're classed as different games.
And since I wouldn't know the differences between 2X and 2 I couldn't comment. If they just bunged an X on the end to make it sound cooler, or updated.. then of course not. If it had new play modes, more features, new areas, more characters then yes.
> But they are not, they had the same structure, the SAME DAMN GAME!
>
> Would you call Tony Hawks 2X on the X-box a different game to Tony
> Hawks 2?
So what if two games have the same structure? EA sports game usually have the more or less the same structure year after year. They're classed as different games.
And since I wouldn't know the differences between 2X and 2 I couldn't comment. If they just bunged an X on the end to make it sound cooler, or updated.. then of course not. If it had new play modes, more features, new areas, more characters then yes.
But they are not, they had the same structure, the SAME DAMN GAME!
Would you call Tony Hawks 2X on the X-box a different game to Tony Hawks 2?
Would you call Tony Hawks 2X on the X-box a different game to Tony Hawks 2?
Dringo wrote:
> It is an upgraded port, like Skies of Arcadia legends.
I refuse to call it a port. It's not just a port.. or even an upgraded port. It's not a totally different game either.. but a port to me is the same game on a different platform.
Both Skies and Animal Crossing (in Japan anyway) got name changes for their "ports" which signified they were different games.
> It is an upgraded port, like Skies of Arcadia legends.
I refuse to call it a port. It's not just a port.. or even an upgraded port. It's not a totally different game either.. but a port to me is the same game on a different platform.
Both Skies and Animal Crossing (in Japan anyway) got name changes for their "ports" which signified they were different games.
It is an upgraded port, like Skies of Arcadia legends.
Strafio wrote:
> I think that's someone's mis-interpretation of it.
>
> I saw real time speech where you typed what you said to the animals
> on the second screen. Besides, the Gamecube version was a straight
> port with smoothened visuals and GBA connectivity. :-)
Nuh-uh. More characters. Trust me, there are.
> I think that's someone's mis-interpretation of it.
>
> I saw real time speech where you typed what you said to the animals
> on the second screen. Besides, the Gamecube version was a straight
> port with smoothened visuals and GBA connectivity. :-)
Nuh-uh. More characters. Trust me, there are.
And a few new NES games.
Yep Strafio is right.
Yep Strafio is right.
I think that's someone's mis-interpretation of it.
I saw real time speech where you typed what you said to the animals on the second screen. Besides, the Gamecube version was a straight port with smoothened visuals and GBA connectivity. :-)
I saw real time speech where you typed what you said to the animals on the second screen. Besides, the Gamecube version was a straight port with smoothened visuals and GBA connectivity. :-)
Strafio wrote:
> Which one's the port?
> The Gamecube one, right?
>
> The DS one is meant to be brand new...
The DS is a version of the N64 build, that's what I heard reported at E3.
> Which one's the port?
> The Gamecube one, right?
>
> The DS one is meant to be brand new...
The DS is a version of the N64 build, that's what I heard reported at E3.
Page: