The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'Killzone'.
can killzone really be as good as they say? post here.
Ninjax
Ninjax
Page:
Clazon wrote:
> witch-king wrote:
> Really. I would hit a ball in to the stands for six and the
> commentating would correlate with what happened on the field.
>
> "It's in the air...and six..."
>
> That's right, then Geoffers says "That's gone a long way"
>
> there's trouble here....it's a suicidal run-out!...
>
> No. Cos you've already hit it into the stands.
>
> >He's bowled him!
>
> Well then clearly you didn't get bat to ball and the chances of you
> hitting a six are very limited.
>
> Huh?
>
> Indeed.
No. All of these events happened off the same delivery.
> witch-king wrote:
> Really. I would hit a ball in to the stands for six and the
> commentating would correlate with what happened on the field.
>
> "It's in the air...and six..."
>
> That's right, then Geoffers says "That's gone a long way"
>
> there's trouble here....it's a suicidal run-out!...
>
> No. Cos you've already hit it into the stands.
>
> >He's bowled him!
>
> Well then clearly you didn't get bat to ball and the chances of you
> hitting a six are very limited.
>
> Huh?
>
> Indeed.
No. All of these events happened off the same delivery.
Stranger In Paradise wrote:
> You mean like the Conflict Desert Storm games, Halo, Shadow Ops,
> SOCOM, SOCOM 2 etc?
>
> To me, both SOCOM games were a case of "nice idea but
> crap". Cheaters wrecked the first game online, second one didn't
> improve much at all plus I just find the whole PS2 online system
> clunky and slow compared to Live.
No, not really.
More that it's not just a party, you have less control over the battle - ie. air strikes.
Not just infantry etc...
> You mean like the Conflict Desert Storm games, Halo, Shadow Ops,
> SOCOM, SOCOM 2 etc?
>
> To me, both SOCOM games were a case of "nice idea but
> crap". Cheaters wrecked the first game online, second one didn't
> improve much at all plus I just find the whole PS2 online system
> clunky and slow compared to Live.
No, not really.
More that it's not just a party, you have less control over the battle - ie. air strikes.
Not just infantry etc...
Meh, I'm not too excited.
witch-king wrote:
> Really. I would hit a ball in to the stands for six and the
> commentating would correlate with what happened on the field.
>
> "It's in the air...and six..."
That's right, then Geoffers says "That's gone a long way"
> there's trouble here....it's a suicidal run-out!...
No. Cos you've already hit it into the stands.
>He's bowled him!
Well then clearly you didn't get bat to ball and the chances of you hitting a six are very limited.
> Huh?
Indeed.
> Really. I would hit a ball in to the stands for six and the
> commentating would correlate with what happened on the field.
>
> "It's in the air...and six..."
That's right, then Geoffers says "That's gone a long way"
> there's trouble here....it's a suicidal run-out!...
No. Cos you've already hit it into the stands.
>He's bowled him!
Well then clearly you didn't get bat to ball and the chances of you hitting a six are very limited.
> Huh?
Indeed.
Coin wrote:
> Nice whole 'entire war' thing.... No longer just one man on his own.
You mean like the Conflict Desert Storm games, Halo, Shadow Ops, SOCOM, SOCOM 2 etc?
To me, both SOCOM games were a case of "nice idea but crap". Cheaters wrecked the first game online, second one didn't improve much at all plus I just find the whole PS2 online system clunky and slow compared to Live.
> Nice whole 'entire war' thing.... No longer just one man on his own.
You mean like the Conflict Desert Storm games, Halo, Shadow Ops, SOCOM, SOCOM 2 etc?
To me, both SOCOM games were a case of "nice idea but crap". Cheaters wrecked the first game online, second one didn't improve much at all plus I just find the whole PS2 online system clunky and slow compared to Live.
Meh.
Killzone will be good.
Who cares if it's better than Halo 2?
Does it really matter as long as it's fun to play? Hell, SoF2 sucks, but I love it online. Whooo...
Knives.
Killzone will be good.
Who cares if it's better than Halo 2?
Does it really matter as long as it's fun to play? Hell, SoF2 sucks, but I love it online. Whooo...
Knives.
Yet another intelligence point to the Ghost. It looks like you rolled your eyes so far back you can't even see well anymore.
witch-king wrote:
> What What? The main mode of Killzone is online play.
Erm...who said that?
> What What? The main mode of Killzone is online play.
Erm...who said that?
Stranger In Paradise wrote:
> Seriously, if a game is crap then online doesn't save it. Hopefully
> we'll get a demo soon to play and make out minds up properly.
What What? The main mode of Killzone is online play.
> Seriously, if a game is crap then online doesn't save it. Hopefully
> we'll get a demo soon to play and make out minds up properly.
What What? The main mode of Killzone is online play.
Stranger In Paradise wrote:
> Seriously, if a game is crap then online doesn't save it. Hopefully
> we'll get a demo soon to play and make out minds up properly.
Socom 1 was saved by it's online play. The one player game was horrible with god awful AI but the online was very fun and enjoyable (until the idiot foriegners and cheaters decided to invade the UK server)
Socom 2 though was both horrible online and single player :-D
> Seriously, if a game is crap then online doesn't save it. Hopefully
> we'll get a demo soon to play and make out minds up properly.
Socom 1 was saved by it's online play. The one player game was horrible with god awful AI but the online was very fun and enjoyable (until the idiot foriegners and cheaters decided to invade the UK server)
Socom 2 though was both horrible online and single player :-D
Page: