The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
i thought it was a disapointment at the end. also sum levels were very repetitive. other than that cool dual weapons. and enrgy sword owns. also it waSNT AS GOOD AS I THOught.but it was worth buying because of the multiplayer. and some single player.
Page:
Game's okay, but like the first, not what the hype would have you believe.
Also feels rushed in places. Gameplay is fine, but some of the cut-scenes are just terrible, with some real pop-up issues with polygons near the front of the scene. Only explanation is that they rushed it, or they've tried to push the machine too far.
Also feels rushed in places. Gameplay is fine, but some of the cut-scenes are just terrible, with some real pop-up issues with polygons near the front of the scene. Only explanation is that they rushed it, or they've tried to push the machine too far.
Again it was as good as I thought it was, better than the first. I wasnt expected much so I was going to be easy to please
Grëén ƒérð¢it¥ wrote:
> Original Halo:
> The library: Cross bridge, shoot brown exploding things in a room,
> cross bridge... Now repeat that about 20 times for a single level.
'Tis a good point, but have you reached Sacred Icon yet on Halo 2? ...
Piston, Flood, Sentinels...
Piston, Flood, Sentinels...
ENFORCER...
repeat cycle.
No, it wasn't a disappointment. Whilst it didn't live up to the hype (no game could ever live up to the hype that this got) it's still a very, very good game.
> Original Halo:
> The library: Cross bridge, shoot brown exploding things in a room,
> cross bridge... Now repeat that about 20 times for a single level.
'Tis a good point, but have you reached Sacred Icon yet on Halo 2? ...
Piston, Flood, Sentinels...
Piston, Flood, Sentinels...
ENFORCER...
repeat cycle.
No, it wasn't a disappointment. Whilst it didn't live up to the hype (no game could ever live up to the hype that this got) it's still a very, very good game.
munn wrote:
> gaybys wrote:
> Very_Metal wrote:
> every bit as slow, plodding and tedious as the first one.
> a fitting sequal indeed.
>
> Yeah, what the hell is up with how slow the characters move in Halo?
>
> What they don't tell you is that Master Chief is in fact a 96 year
> old pensioner who got lose on his way to the post office and is now
> an intergalactic bounty hunter or whatever he is.
an intergalactic benefits collector?
> gaybys wrote:
> Very_Metal wrote:
> every bit as slow, plodding and tedious as the first one.
> a fitting sequal indeed.
>
> Yeah, what the hell is up with how slow the characters move in Halo?
>
> What they don't tell you is that Master Chief is in fact a 96 year
> old pensioner who got lose on his way to the post office and is now
> an intergalactic bounty hunter or whatever he is.
an intergalactic benefits collector?
wot?????? repetative???? play halo1...the most repetative game i have ever played! halo2 was in no way a dissapointment to me!!
gaybys wrote:
> Very_Metal wrote:
> every bit as slow, plodding and tedious as the first one.
> a fitting sequal indeed.
>
> Yeah, what the hell is up with how slow the characters move in Halo?
What they don't tell you is that Master Chief is in fact a 96 year old pensioner who got lose on his way to the post office and is now an intergalactic bounty hunter or whatever he is.
> Very_Metal wrote:
> every bit as slow, plodding and tedious as the first one.
> a fitting sequal indeed.
>
> Yeah, what the hell is up with how slow the characters move in Halo?
What they don't tell you is that Master Chief is in fact a 96 year old pensioner who got lose on his way to the post office and is now an intergalactic bounty hunter or whatever he is.
SonicRav's yearly post.
Hurrah.
Dissapointment (lengthwise and storywise) offline
Excelled expectations online.
Hurrah.
Dissapointment (lengthwise and storywise) offline
Excelled expectations online.
Great game, and probably the best of the year, BUT...
It was too short. Not because it didn't take too long to complete, but because the story finnishes half way through.. it's like part 1 of a 2 part series. You just yearn for more!
I felt a few parts of the game were too similar to the first - in the same way the plot of The Return of the Jedi is a little too alike A New Hope (Oooo, let's build another Death Star!). Some of the levels had a distinct feeling of being lifted from the last game.
Some parts of the game were too disorganised.. I just got annoyed running through dark corridors as fast as I could to avoid the same old enemies.
But still, and awesome games.
SonicRav
It was too short. Not because it didn't take too long to complete, but because the story finnishes half way through.. it's like part 1 of a 2 part series. You just yearn for more!
I felt a few parts of the game were too similar to the first - in the same way the plot of The Return of the Jedi is a little too alike A New Hope (Oooo, let's build another Death Star!). Some of the levels had a distinct feeling of being lifted from the last game.
Some parts of the game were too disorganised.. I just got annoyed running through dark corridors as fast as I could to avoid the same old enemies.
But still, and awesome games.
SonicRav
Very_Metal wrote:
> every bit as slow, plodding and tedious as the first one.
> a fitting sequal indeed.
Yeah, what the hell is up with how slow the characters move in Halo?
> every bit as slow, plodding and tedious as the first one.
> a fitting sequal indeed.
Yeah, what the hell is up with how slow the characters move in Halo?
Its good on LIVE though I think.
Page: